148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19720335)
1. Comparison of induction of labour and expectant management in postterm pregnancy: a matched cohort study.
Hermus MAA; Verhoeven CJM; Mol BW; de Wolf GS; Fiedeldeij CA
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(5):351-356. PubMed ID: 19720335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Timing induction of labour at 41 or 42 weeks? A closer look at time frames of comparison: A review.
Keulen JKJ; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; van der Post JAM; de Miranda E
Midwifery; 2018 Nov; 66():111-118. PubMed ID: 30170263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial.
Boulvain M; Senat MV; Perrotin F; Winer N; Beucher G; Subtil D; Bretelle F; Azria E; Hejaiej D; Vendittelli F; Capelle M; Langer B; Matis R; Connan L; Gillard P; Kirkpatrick C; Ceysens G; Faron G; Irion O; Rozenberg P;
Lancet; 2015 Jun; 385(9987):2600-5. PubMed ID: 25863654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Labor induction versus expectant management for postterm pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Olivier F; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 101(6):1312-8. PubMed ID: 12798542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Term elective induction of labour and perinatal outcomes in obese women: retrospective cohort study.
Lee VR; Darney BG; Snowden JM; Main EK; Gilbert W; Chung J; Caughey AB
BJOG; 2016 Jan; 123(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 26840780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation].
Rozenberg P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov; 45(9):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 27771202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial.
Wennerholm UB; Saltvedt S; Wessberg A; Alkmark M; Bergh C; Wendel SB; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Sengpiel V; Wesström J; Wennergren G; Wikström AK; Elden H; Stephansson O; Hagberg H
BMJ; 2019 Nov; 367():l6131. PubMed ID: 31748223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction of labour for post term pregnancy: an observational study.
Parry E; Parry D; Pattison N
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Aug; 38(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 9761152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of induction of labour versus serial antenatal monitoring in the Canadian Multicentre Postterm Pregnancy Trial.
Goeree R; Hannah M; Hewson S
CMAJ; 1995 May; 152(9):1445-50. PubMed ID: 7728693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Induction of labour for postdates in nulliparous women with uncomplicated pregnancy - is the caesarean section rate really lower?
Mahomed K; Pungsornruk K; Gibbons K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Oct; 36(7):916-920. PubMed ID: 27612522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postterm pregnancy: putting the merits of a policy of induction of labor into perspective.
Hannah ME; Huh C; Hewson SA; Hannah WJ
Birth; 1996 Mar; 23(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 8703252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Caesarean section following induction of labour in uncomplicated first births- a population-based cross-sectional analysis of 42,950 births.
Davey MA; King J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Apr; 16():92. PubMed ID: 27121614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maternal risk factors for postterm pregnancy and cesarean delivery following labor induction.
Roos N; Sahlin L; Ekman-Ordeberg G; Kieler H; Stephansson O
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1003-10. PubMed ID: 20636240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of induction of labour versus expectant management in women with impending post-term pregnancies: the 41 week - 42 week dilemma.
Kortekaas JC; Bruinsma A; Keulen JK; van Dillen J; Oudijk MA; Zwart JJ; Bakker JJ; de Bont D; Nieuwenhuijze M; Offerhaus PM; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche F; Mol BW; de Miranda E
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Oct; 14():350. PubMed ID: 25338555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Management of prolonged pregnancy: a randomized trial of induction of labour and antepartum foetal monitoring.
James C; George SS; Gaunekar N; Seshadri L
Natl Med J India; 2001; 14(5):270-3. PubMed ID: 11767219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of labour induction on the risk of caesarean delivery: using propensity scores to control confounding by indication.
Danilack VA; Dore DD; Triche EW; Muri JH; Phipps MG; Savitz DA
BJOG; 2016 Aug; 123(9):1521-9. PubMed ID: 26411752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induction of twin pregnancy and the risk of caesarean delivery: a cohort study.
Jonsson M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Jun; 15():136. PubMed ID: 26077416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in postterm pregnancy. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units.
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Mar; 170(3):716-23. PubMed ID: 7710467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Earlier induction of labour in post term pregnancies--A historical cohort study.
Kjeldsen LL; Sindberg M; Maimburg RD
Midwifery; 2015 May; 31(5):526-31. PubMed ID: 25726005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risks of induction of labour in uncomplicated term pregnancies.
Boulvain M; Marcoux S; Bureau M; Fortier M; Fraser W
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 15(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 11383577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
