These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19720343)

  • 1. Dinoprostone compared with misoprostol for cervical ripening for induction of labor at term.
    Church S; Van Meter A; Whitfield R
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(5):405-411. PubMed ID: 19720343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of prostaglandins E1 and E2, dinoprostone, and misoprostol in cervical ripening and the induction of labor: a mechanistic approach.
    Bakker R; Pierce S; Myers D
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Aug; 296(2):167-179. PubMed ID: 28585102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R; Greaves PC
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re: A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in induction of labour: Excessive, uterine activity is a maternal, neurological emergency.
    Quinn MJ
    BJOG; 2016 Nov; 123(12):2048. PubMed ID: 27753252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
    Veerman HM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Jan; 149(2):105-6; author reply 106. PubMed ID: 15688844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of cervical ripening methods for induction of labour: A population-based study using coarsened exact matching.
    Blanc-Petitjean P; Carbonne B; Deneux-Tharaux C; Salomé M; Goffinet F; Le Ray C;
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 33(5):313-322. PubMed ID: 31342567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomised double-blind study of vaginal misoprostol vs dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labour induction in prolonged pregnancy.
    Lee HY
    Singapore Med J; 1997 Jul; 38(7):292-4. PubMed ID: 9339095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for pre-induction cervical ripening at-term.
    Chitrakar NS
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2012 Jan; 10(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 22929629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical ripening and induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter cervical traction.
    Kashanian M; Akbarian AR; Fekrat M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Jan; 92(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 16246342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized trial between two active labor management protocols in the presence of an unfavorable cervix.
    Bolnick JM; Velazquez MD; Gonzalez JL; Rappaport VJ; McIlwain-Dunivan G; Rayburn WF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 14749647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Votipka JR
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Jul; 45(1):20. PubMed ID: 9228905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cervical ripening at term. A randomized and prospective study: Misoprotol versus dinoprostone].
    Trabelsi H; Mathlouthi N; Zayen S; Dhouib M; Chaabene K; Trabelsi K; Amouri H; Ben Ayed B; Guermazi M
    Tunis Med; 2012 May; 90(5):362-9. PubMed ID: 22585642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized comparison.
    Bartha JL; Comino-Delgado R; Garcia-Benasach F; Martinez-Del-Fresno P; Moreno-Corral LJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 10960643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Induction of labor by prostaglandin E(2) in relation to the Bishop score.
    Kemp B; Winkler M; Rath W
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2000 Oct; 71(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 11044536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The risk of placental abruption when using prostaglandins for cervical ripening in women with preeclampsia: comparing misoprostol versus dinoprostone.
    Martinez de Tejada B; Martillotti G; Lapaire O; Hoesli I; Irion O
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Sep; 23(9):988-93. PubMed ID: 19941444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.