These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19720968)

  • 1. Pointing the way to informed medical decision making: test characteristics of clinical breast examination.
    Barton MB; Elmore JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1223-5. PubMed ID: 19720968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.
    Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Findings from 752,081 clinical breast examinations reported to a national screening program from 1995 through 1998.
    Bobo JK; Lee NC; Thames SF
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Jun; 92(12):971-6. PubMed ID: 10861308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual and combined effectiveness of palpation, thermography, and mammography in breast cancer screening.
    Gohagan JK; Rodes ND; Blackwell CW; Darby WP; Farrell C; Herder T; Pearson DK; Spitznagel EL; Wallace MD
    Prev Med; 1980 Nov; 9(6):713-21. PubMed ID: 7454696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Population screening for breast cancer by mammography in The Netherlands. Expectations, early results, negative effects and conditions for large-scale screening.
    Hendriks JH; Verbeek AL
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):186-91. PubMed ID: 3896616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
    US Preventive Services Task Force
    Ann Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 151(10):716-26, W-236. PubMed ID: 19920272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer screening: from science to recommendation.
    Petitti DB; Calonge N; LeFevre ML; Melnyk BM; Wilt TJ; Schwartz JS;
    Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 20574080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, Version 3.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
    Bevers TB; Helvie M; Bonaccio E; Calhoun KE; Daly MB; Farrar WB; Garber JE; Gray R; Greenberg CC; Greenup R; Hansen NM; Harris RE; Heerdt AS; Helsten T; Hodgkiss L; Hoyt TL; Huff JG; Jacobs L; Lehman CD; Monsees B; Niell BL; Parker CC; Pearlman M; Philpotts L; Shepardson LB; Smith ML; Stein M; Tumyan L; Williams C; Bergman MA; Kumar R
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1362-1389. PubMed ID: 30442736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The abnormal mammogram in clinically normal breasts: a challenge for surgeons.
    Deschênes L
    Can J Surg; 1995 Apr; 38(2):110-1. PubMed ID: 7728662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can Breast Self-examination and Clinical Breast Examination Along With Increasing Breast Awareness Facilitate Earlier Detection of Breast Cancer in Populations With Advanced Stages at Diagnosis?
    Albeshan SM; Hossain SZ; Mackey MG; Brennan PC
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Jun; 20(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 32147405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ROC analysis of mammography and palpation for breast screening.
    Gohagan JK; Spitznagel EL; McCrate MM; Frank TB
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 6511268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The eternal problem of false positives in mammography screening].
    Seguí Díaz M
    Semergen; 2017 Mar; 43(2):151-153. PubMed ID: 27117788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. For the proposition: pre-menopausal women should be actively encouraged to seek screening mammograms.
    Maidment A
    Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):171-2. PubMed ID: 15000600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diaphanography in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Drexler B; Davis JL; Schofield G
    Radiology; 1985 Oct; 157(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 4034975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening Mammography for Average-Risk Women: The Controversy and NCCN's Position.
    Helvie MA; Bevers TB
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1398-1404. PubMed ID: 30442738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of breast consistency at palpation with breast density at mammography.
    Boren WL; Hunter TB; Bjelland JC; Hunt KR
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Sep; 25(9):1010-1. PubMed ID: 2211041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dangers and unreliability of mammography: breast examination is a safe, effective, and practical alternative.
    Epstein SS; Bertell R; Seaman B
    Int J Health Serv; 2001; 31(3):605-15. PubMed ID: 11562008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. False-positive results in breast cancer screening.
    Evans MF
    Can Fam Physician; 1999 Jan; 45():73-4. PubMed ID: 10889859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening for breast cancer: how useful are clinical breast examinations?
    Baines CJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Jun; 92(12):958-9. PubMed ID: 10861299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.