436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19724096)
1. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer.
Mu G; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5613-23. PubMed ID: 19724096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver IMRT plans in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Kim Y; Verhey LJ; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2147-56. PubMed ID: 17404460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy.
Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Longobardi B; Fazio F; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16546279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of MLC leaf position errors on simple and complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer.
Mu G; Ludlum E; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 18182688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lens dose in MLC-based IMRT treatments of the head and neck.
Pawlicki T; Luxton G; Le QT; Findley D; Ma CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):293-9. PubMed ID: 15093926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
Jones S; Williams M
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can photon IMRT be improved by combination with mixed electron and photon techniques?
Mu X; Olofsson L; Karlsson M; Sjögren R; Zackrisson B
Acta Oncol; 2004; 43(8):727-35. PubMed ID: 15764217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric comparison of split field and fixed jaw techniques for large IMRT target volumes in the head and neck.
Srivastava SP; Das IJ; Kumar A; Johnstone PA
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 19944592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Major reduction of monitor units with the avoidance of leaf-sequencing step by direct aperture based IMRT optimisation.
Seppälä J; Lahtinen T; Kolmonen P
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 18766997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intensity modulated radiation therapy with multileaf collimators of different leaf widths: a comparison of achievable dose distributions.
Nill S; Tücking T; Münter MW; Oelfke U
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Apr; 75(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 15878108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impacts of multileaf collimators leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: analysis of two commercial elekta devices.
Wang S; Gong Y; Xu Q; Bai S; Lu Y; Jiang Q; Chen N
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 20488691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating the fundamentals of IMRT decomposition using ten simple collimator models.
Anderson JW; Symonds-Tayler R; Webb S
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(9):2225-36. PubMed ID: 16625038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An interlaced IMRT technique for elongated tumor volumes.
Meyer J; Richter A; Pfreundner L; Guckenberger M; Krieger T; Schwab F; Flentje M
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(2):170-8. PubMed ID: 19410147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of conformal and intensity modulated treatment planning techniques for early prostate cancer.
Vaarkamp J; Malde R; Dixit S; Hamilton CS
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Jun; 53(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 19624299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The delivery of IMRT with a single physical modulator for multiple fields: a feasibility study for paranasal sinus cancer.
O'Daniel JC; Dong L; Kuban DA; Liu H; Schechter N; Tucker SL; Rosen I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(3):876-87. PubMed ID: 14967445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of dynamic and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning and delivery.
Alaei P; Higgins PD; Weaver R; Nguyen N
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15023386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
