210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19724705)
1. Comparative sensitivity of PCR primer sets for detection of Cryptosporidium parvum.
Yu JR; Lee SU; Park WY
Korean J Parasitol; 2009 Sep; 47(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 19724705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of the Cryptosporidium oocyst wall protein (COWP) gene in a nested PCR approach for detection infection in cattle.
Kato S; Lindergard G; Mohammed HO
Vet Parasitol; 2003 Feb; 111(2-3):153-9. PubMed ID: 12531291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) assay targeting MIC1 for detection of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis oocysts.
Hønsvall BK; Robertson LJ
Exp Parasitol; 2017 Jan; 172():61-67. PubMed ID: 27998735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of Cryptosporidium parvum DNA in human feces by nested PCR.
Balatbat AB; Jordan GW; Tang YJ; Silva J
J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jul; 34(7):1769-72. PubMed ID: 8784586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of primers amplifying DNA targets for the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. using C. parvum HNJ-1 Japanese isolate in water samples.
Leetz AS; Sotiriadou I; Ongerth J; Karanis P
Parasitol Res; 2007 Sep; 101(4):951-62. PubMed ID: 17514380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative efficacy of conventional primer sets in detection of Cryptosporidium parvum for diagnostic use.
Kar S; Daugschies A; Bangoura B
Parasitol Res; 2010 Feb; 106(3):683-7. PubMed ID: 20107835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Specific and quantitative detection and identification of Cryptosporidium hominis and C. parvum in clinical and environmental samples.
Yang R; Murphy C; Song Y; Ng-Hublin J; Estcourt A; Hijjawi N; Chalmers R; Hadfield S; Bath A; Gordon C; Ryan U
Exp Parasitol; 2013 Sep; 135(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 23838581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Species-specific, nested PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism detection of single Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.
Sturbaum GD; Reed C; Hoover PJ; Jost BH; Marshall MM; Sterling CR
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2001 Jun; 67(6):2665-8. PubMed ID: 11375178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Real-time PCR for the detection of Cryptosporidium parvum.
Higgins JA; Fayer R; Trout JM; Xiao L; Lal AA; Kerby S; Jenkins MC
J Microbiol Methods; 2001 Dec; 47(3):323-37. PubMed ID: 11714523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An assay combining cell culture with reverse transcriptase PCR to detect and determine the infectivity of waterborne Cryptosporidium parvum.
Rochelle PA; Ferguson DM; Handojo TJ; De Leon R; Stewart MH; Wolfe RL
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1997 May; 63(5):2029-37. PubMed ID: 9143132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cryptosporidium Diagnostic Assays: Molecular Detection.
Robinson G; Elwin K; Chalmers RM
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2052():11-22. PubMed ID: 31452154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A rapid method for extracting oocyst DNA from Cryptosporidium-positive human faeces for outbreak investigations.
Nichols RA; Moore JE; Smith HV
J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Jun; 65(3):512-24. PubMed ID: 16290112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cloning of a species-specific gene fragment from Cryptosporidium parvum and the development of diagnostic PCR primers].
Tian ZC; Zhang XC; Li JH; Yin JG; Yang J; He HX
Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi; 2002; 20(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 12567561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection and discrimination of Cryptosporidium parvum and C. hominis in water samples by immunomagnetic separation-PCR.
Ochiai Y; Takada C; Hosaka M
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 Feb; 71(2):898-903. PubMed ID: 15691946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A single-tube nested real-time polymerase chain reaction for sensitive contained detection of Cryptosporidium parvum.
Minarovicová J; Kaclíková E; Krascsenicsová K; Siekel P; Kuchta T
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Nov; 49(5):568-72. PubMed ID: 19709364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of most probable number-PCR and most probable number-foci detection method for quantifying infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in environmental samples.
Carey CM; Lee H; Trevors JT
J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Nov; 67(2):363-72. PubMed ID: 16730821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The sensitivity of PCR detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in fecal samples using two DNA extraction methods.
Lindergard G; Nydam DV; Wade SE; Schaaf SL; Mohammed HO
Mol Diagn; 2003; 7(3-4):147-53. PubMed ID: 15068384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection and differentiation of Cryptosporidium spp. in human clinical samples by use of real-time PCR.
Hadfield SJ; Robinson G; Elwin K; Chalmers RM
J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Mar; 49(3):918-24. PubMed ID: 21177904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterisation of a Cryptosporidium isolate from water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) by sequencing of a fragment of the Cryptosporidium oocyst wall protein gene (COWP).
Gómez-Couso H; Amar CF; McLauchlin J; Ares-Mazás E
Vet Parasitol; 2005 Jul; 131(1-2):139-44. PubMed ID: 15935559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Failure to differentiate Cryptosporidium parvum from C. meleagridis based on PCR amplification of eight DNA sequences.
Champliaud D; Gobet P; Naciri M; Vagner O; Lopez J; Buisson JC; Varga I; Harly G; Mancassola R; Bonnin A
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1998 Apr; 64(4):1454-8. PubMed ID: 9575132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
