These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19725234)

  • 1. Clinical performance of ART restorations in primary teeth: a survival analysis.
    Faccin ES; Ferreira SH; Kramer PF; Ardenghi TM; Feldens CA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2009; 33(4):295-8. PubMed ID: 19725234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months.
    Ersin NK; Candan U; Aykut A; Onçağ O; Eronat C; Kose T
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Nov; 137(11):1529-36. PubMed ID: 17082278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized clinical trial of class II restoration in permanent teeth comparing ART with composite resin after 12 months.
    Menezes-Silva R; Velasco SRM; Bastos RS; Molina G; Honório HM; Frencken JE; Navarro MFL
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Sep; 23(9):3623-3635. PubMed ID: 30612246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two years survival rate of class II composite resin restorations prepared by ART with and without a chemomechanical caries removal gel in primary molars.
    Topaloglu-Ak A; Eden E; Frencken JE; Oncag O
    Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Sep; 13(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 19101739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vitremer restorative cement for children: three clinicians' observations in three pediatric dental practices.
    Croll TP; Helpin ML; Donly KJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(6):391-8, 374. PubMed ID: 11204061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: results from a paediatric dental clinic.
    Pinto Gdos S; Oliveira LJ; Romano AR; Schardosim LR; Bonow ML; Pacce M; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Torriani DD
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1248-54. PubMed ID: 25150105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of conventional treatment using bulk-fill composite resin versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatments in primary and permanent dentition: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.
    Olegário IC; Hesse D; Bönecker M; Imparato JC; Braga MM; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
    BMC Oral Health; 2016 Aug; 17(1):34. PubMed ID: 27485432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of resin modified glass ionomer cement and composite resin in class II primary molar restorations: a 2-year parallel randomised clinical trial.
    Dermata A; Papageorgiou SN; Fragkou S; Kotsanos N
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2018 Dec; 19(6):393-401. PubMed ID: 30324561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
    Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation.
    Croll TP; Bar-Zion Y; Segura A; Donly KJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1110-6. PubMed ID: 11575018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Provision of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) restorations to Chinese pre-school children--a 30-month evaluation.
    Lo EC; Holmgren CJ
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2001 Jan; 11(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 11309870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One year Survival Rate of Ketac Molar versus Vitro Molar for Occlusoproximal ART Restorations: a RCT.
    Anna Luisa de Brito P; Isabel Cristina O; Clarissa Calil B; Ana Flávia Bissoto C; José Carlos Pettorossi I; Daniela Prócida R
    Braz Oral Res; 2017 Nov; 31():e88. PubMed ID: 29116299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical performance of aesthetic restorative materials in primary teeth according to the FDI criteria.
    Bektas Donmez S; Uysal S; Dolgun A; Turgut MD
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):202-212. PubMed ID: 27759409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective and randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of ART restorations with high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement versus conventional restorations with resin composite in Class II cavities of permanent teeth: two-year follow-up.
    Menezes-Silva R; Velasco SRM; BRESCIANi E; Bastos RDS; Navarro MFL
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2021; 29():e20200609. PubMed ID: 33656064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lack of effect of fluoride releasing resin modified glass ionomer restorations on the contacting surface of adjacent primary molars. a clinical prospective study.
    Kotsanos N; Dionysopoulos P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep; 5(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 15471520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.