These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19726121)

  • 1. Extubation force: a comparison of adhesive tape, non-adhesive tape and a commercial endotracheal tube holder.
    Owen R; Castle N; Hann H; Reeves D; Naidoo R; Naidoo S
    Resuscitation; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1296-300. PubMed ID: 19726121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extubation force: tape versus endotracheal tube holders.
    Carlson J; Mayrose J; Krause R; Jehle D
    Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Dec; 50(6):686-91. PubMed ID: 17599694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endotracheal tube extubation force: adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube holder.
    Shimizu T; Mizutani T; Yamashita S; Hagiya K; Tanaka M
    Respir Care; 2011 Nov; 56(11):1825-9. PubMed ID: 21605477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparison of the Haider Tube-Guard® Endotracheal Tube Holder Versus Adhesive Tape to Determine if This Novel Device Can Reduce Endotracheal Tube Movement and Prevent Unplanned Extubation.
    Buckley JC; Brown AP; Shin JS; Rogers KM; Hoftman NN
    Anesth Analg; 2016 May; 122(5):1439-43. PubMed ID: 26983051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endotracheal tube fixation methods for optimal stability: a comparison of adhesive tape, suture, and tape-suture fixation.
    Farbod F; Tuli P; Robertson BF; Jackson IT
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1250-1. PubMed ID: 20613600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparative study of oral tracheal tube extubation force in a baby manikin model: taping methods and tube diameters].
    Kurokawa Y; Shimizu T; Yamashita S; Tanaka M; Mizutani T
    Masui; 2011 Aug; 60(8):982-4. PubMed ID: 21861432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of tape-tying versus a tube-holding device for securing endotracheal tubes in adults.
    Murdoch E; Holdgate A
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2007 Oct; 35(5):730-5. PubMed ID: 17933160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shifts in endotracheal tube position due to chest compressions: a simulation comparison by fixation method.
    Komasawa N; Fujiwara S; Miyazaki S; Ohchi F; Minami T
    J Emerg Med; 2015 Feb; 48(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 25440458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial.
    Landsperger JS; Byram JM; Lloyd BD; Rice TW;
    Crit Care; 2019 May; 23(1):161. PubMed ID: 31064406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of tube-taping versus a tube-holding device for securing endotracheal tubes in adults undergoing surgery in prone position.
    Santhosh MC; Torgal SV; Pai RB; Roopa S; Santoshi VB; Rao RP
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2013; 64(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 24191528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of four endotracheal tube holders.
    Kaplow R; Bookbinder M
    Heart Lung; 1994; 23(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 8150646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of techniques for securing the endotracheal tube while wearing chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear protection: a manikin study.
    Castle N; Owen R; Clark S; Hann M; Reeces D; Gurney I
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2010; 25(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 21181696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of two methods used to stabilize oral endotracheal tubes.
    Tasota FJ; Hoffman LA; Zullo TG; Jamison G
    Heart Lung; 1987 Mar; 16(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 3643914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the effectiveness of endotracheal tube holder with the conventional method in a manikin model.
    Suttapanit K; Yuksen C; Aramvanitch K; Meemongkol T; Chandech A; Songkathee B; Nuanprom P
    Turk J Emerg Med; 2020; 20(4):175-179. PubMed ID: 33089025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Securing endotracheal tubes: does NeoBar availability improve tube position?
    Brinsmead TL; Davies MW
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2010 May; 46(5):243-8. PubMed ID: 20337879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New method for the fixation of the endotracheal tube in patients with facial hair.
    Kamalipour H; Kardan K
    East Mediterr Health J; 2003; 9(1-2):108-12. PubMed ID: 15562739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of tape adhesive strength on endotracheal tubes.
    Fenje N; Steward DJ
    Can J Anaesth; 1988 Mar; 35(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 3356058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the Force Required for Dislodgement Between Secured and Unsecured Airways.
    Davenport C; Martin-Gill C; Wang HE; Mayrose J; Carlson JN
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2018; 22(6):778-781. PubMed ID: 29714527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Taping methods and tape types for securing oral endotracheal tubes.
    Patel N; Smith CE; Pinchak AC; Hancock DE
    Can J Anaesth; 1997 Mar; 44(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 9067056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Types of Commercial Endotracheal Tube Holders, with the Conventional Method in a Manikin Model.
    Nasr Isfahani M; Abootalebi A; Ghaznavi K; Kamali Dolatabadi L
    Adv Biomed Res; 2023; 12():30. PubMed ID: 37057224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.