These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19727300)

  • 1. Legal insanity: assessment of the inability to refrain.
    Donohue A; Arya V; Fitch L; Hammen D
    Psychiatry (Edgmont); 2008 Mar; 5(3):58-66. PubMed ID: 19727300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How reliable are forensic evaluations of legal sanity?
    Gowensmith WN; Murrie DC; Boccaccini MT
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Apr; 37(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 22775304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Insanity defense pleas in Baltimore City: an analysis of outcome.
    Janofsky JS; Dunn MH; Roskes EJ; Briskin JK; Rudolph MS
    Am J Psychiatry; 1996 Nov; 153(11):1464-8. PubMed ID: 8890682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making.
    Pitt SE; Brandt JD; Tellefsen C; Janofsky JS; Cohen ME; Bettis ED; Rappeport JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 9148886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Opinion formation in evaluating sanity at the time of the offense: an examination of 5175 pre-trial evaluations.
    Warren JI; Murrie DC; Chauhan P; Dietz PE; Morris J
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 15048857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The civil liability for damages of the criminally insane.
    Melamed Y; Ganot N; Mester R; Bleich A
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2008; 45(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 19439834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of a new instrument to guide and support insanity evaluations: the defendant's insanity assessment support scale (DIASS).
    Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Roma P; Ferracuti S
    Transl Psychiatry; 2022 Mar; 12(1):115. PubMed ID: 35318308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defendants pleading insanity: an analysis of outcome.
    Janofsky JS; Vandewalle MB; Rappeport JR
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 2758121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity? a comparative study of murderers referred for psychiatric examination by court order.
    Antar AY
    Health Justice; 2023 Sep; 11(1):35. PubMed ID: 37668924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Insanity Defense: Past, Present, and Future.
    Math SB; Kumar CN; Moirangthem S
    Indian J Psychol Med; 2015; 37(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 26702167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of misdemeanor arrests on forensic mental health services: A state-wide review of Virginia sanity evaluations.
    Gardner BO; Murrie DC; Torres AN
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Aug; 44(4):286-299. PubMed ID: 32757609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A confusion of tongues: competence, insanity, psychiatry, and the law.
    Gutheil TG
    Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jun; 50(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 10375145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transferring juvenile defendants from adult to juvenile court: how Maryland forensic evaluators and judges reach their decisions.
    Means RF; Heller LD; Janofsky JS
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 22960915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.
    Warren JI; Rosenfeld B; Fitch WL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 7841509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Competency to stand trial and defendants who lack insight into their mental illness.
    Reisner AD; Piel J; Makey M
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 23503181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impulse control and criminal responsibility: lessons from neuroscience.
    Penney S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 22261322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combined evaluations of competency to stand trial and mental state at the time of the offense: An overlooked methodological consideration?
    Kois L; Wellbeloved-Stone JM; Chauhan P; Warren JI
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Jun; 41(3):217-229. PubMed ID: 28182458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The importance of the patients deemed not guilty by reason of insanity for the psychiatric reform.
    Douzenis A
    Psychiatriki; 2016; 27(3):165-168. PubMed ID: 27837570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linguistic diversity in deaf defendants and due process rights.
    Miller KR; Vernon M
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2001; 6(3):226-34. PubMed ID: 15451852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.