These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19727752)
1. Image-guided spinal injection procedures in open high-field MRI with vertical field orientation: feasibility and technical features. Streitparth F; Walter T; Wonneberger U; Chopra S; Wichlas F; Wagner M; Hermann KG; Hamm B; Teichgräber U Eur Radiol; 2010 Feb; 20(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 19727752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Instrument visualization using conventional and compressed sensing SEMAC for interventional MRI at 3T. Sonnow L; Gilson WD; Raithel E; Nittka M; Wacker F; Fritz J J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1306-1315. PubMed ID: 28940951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-compatible needles and interactive sequences for musculoskeletal interventions using an open high-field magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Wonneberger U; Schnackenburg B; Streitparth F; Walter T; Rump J; Teichgräber UK Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Apr; 33(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 19705200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Percutaneous abscess drainage using near real-time MR guidance in an open 1.0-T MR scanner: proof of concept. Wybranski C; Strach K; Krenzien F; Wonneberger U; Bunke J; Röhl FW; Kosiek O; Ricke J; Fischbach F Invest Radiol; 2013 Jun; 48(6):477-84. PubMed ID: 23462676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR-guided sclerotherapy of low-flow vascular malformations using T2 -weighted interrupted bSSFP (T2 W-iSSFP): comparison of pulse sequences for visualization and needle guidance. Xu D; Herzka DA; Gilson WD; McVeigh ER; Lewin JS; Weiss CR J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Feb; 41(2):525-35. PubMed ID: 24395498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tailored interactive sequences for continuous MR-image-guided freehand biopsies of different organs in an open system at 1.0 tesla (T) - Initial experience. Streitparth F; Althoff C; Jonczyk M; Guettler F; Maurer M; Rathke H; Sponheuer KM; Hamm B; Teichgräber UK; de Bucourt M Biomed Tech (Berl); 2017 Nov; 62(6):557-563. PubMed ID: 28076290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Augmented reality visualisation using an image overlay system for MR-guided interventions: technical performance of spine injection procedures in human cadavers at 1.5 Tesla. Fritz J; U-Thainual P; Ungi T; Flammang AJ; Fichtinger G; Iordachita II; Carrino JA Eur Radiol; 2013 Jan; 23(1):235-45. PubMed ID: 22797956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro assessment of needle artifacts with an interactive three-dimensional MR fluoroscopy system. Thomas C; Springer F; Röthke M; Rempp H; Clasen S; Fritz J; Claussen CD; Pereira PL J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Mar; 21(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 20171560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR-Guided Percutaneous Intradiscal Thermotherapy (MRgPIT): Evaluation of a New Technique for the Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease in Cadaveric Lumbar Spine. Leidenberger T; Winkel A; Philipp C; Rump J; De Bucourt M; Böning G; Teichgräber U; Streitparth F Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2020 Mar; 43(3):505-513. PubMed ID: 31773189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Freehand real-time MRI-guided lumbar spinal injection procedures at 1.5 T: feasibility, accuracy, and safety. Fritz J; Thomas C; Clasen S; Claussen CD; Lewin JS; Pereira PL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):W161-7. PubMed ID: 19304676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro artefact assessment of a new MR-compatible microwave antenna and a standard MR-compatible radiofrequency ablation electrode for tumour ablation. Hoffmann R; Rempp H; Eibofner F; Keßler DE; Blumenstock G; Weiß J; Pereira PL; Nikolaou K; Clasen S Eur Radiol; 2016 Mar; 26(3):771-9. PubMed ID: 26134999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A signal-inducing bone cement for magnetic resonance imaging-guided spinal surgery based on hydroxyapatite and polymethylmethacrylate. Wichlas F; Seebauer CJ; Schilling R; Rump J; Chopra SS; Walter T; Teichgräber UK; Bail HJ Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2012 Jun; 35(3):661-7. PubMed ID: 21629981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Abdominal and pelvic segmented T1-weighted echo-planar imaging and MRI. Comparison with T1-TSE and T2-UTSE sequences]. Maubon A; Berger V; Aubas P; Ferru JM; Rouanet JP J Radiol; 1999 Mar; 80(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 10327336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MRI of the lumbar spine: comparison of 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus conventional 2D sequences at 3.0 T. Lee S; Jee WH; Jung JY; Lee SY; Ryu KS; Ha KY Acta Radiol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24553584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Needle Heating During Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5- and 3.0-T Field Strengths. Khodarahmi I; Bonham LW; Weiss CR; Fritz J Invest Radiol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):396-404. PubMed ID: 32369319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of MR imaging sequences for liver and head and neck interventions: is there a single optimal sequence for all purposes? Boll DT; Lewin JS; Duerk JL; Aschoff AJ; Merkle EM Acad Radiol; 2004 May; 11(5):506-15. PubMed ID: 15147615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]