178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19727753)
1. Diagnostic value of MR elastography in addition to contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast-initial clinical results.
Siegmann KC; Xydeas T; Sinkus R; Kraemer B; Vogel U; Claussen CD
Eur Radiol; 2010 Feb; 20(2):318-25. PubMed ID: 19727753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Value of whole breast magnetic resonance elastography added to MRI for lesion characterization.
Balleyguier C; Lakhdar AB; Dunant A; Mathieu MC; Delaloge S; Sinkus R
NMR Biomed; 2018 Jan; 31(1):. PubMed ID: 29073719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the "Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System" for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions.
Pinker K; Bickel H; Helbich TH; Gruber S; Dubsky P; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Bago-Horvath Z; Weber M; Trattnig S; Bogner W
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1791-802. PubMed ID: 23504036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Diagnostic value of a breast MRI score for the prediction of malignancy of breast lesions detected solely with MRI].
Siegmann KC; Moron HU; Baur A; Hahn M; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Bitzer M
Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 19452398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced 3.0-T breast MRI for characterization of breast lesions: increased specificity by using vascular maps.
Schmitz AC; Peters NH; Veldhuis WB; Gallardo AM; van Diest PJ; Stapper G; van Hillegersberg R; Mali WP; van den Bosch MA
Eur Radiol; 2008 Feb; 18(2):355-64. PubMed ID: 17882425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Real-time MRI navigated US: role in diagnosis and guided biopsy of incidental breast lesions and axillary lymph nodes detected on breast MRI but not on second look US.
Pons EP; Azcón FM; Casas MC; Meca SM; Espona JLG
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jun; 83(6):942-950. PubMed ID: 24725672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR elastography of breast lesions: understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Sinkus R; Siegmann K; Xydeas T; Tanter M; Claussen C; Fink M
Magn Reson Med; 2007 Dec; 58(6):1135-44. PubMed ID: 17969009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterisation of breast masses: utility of quantitative analysis in comparison with MRI.
Caproni N; Marchisio F; Pecchi A; Canossi B; Battista R; D'Alimonte P; Torricelli P
Eur Radiol; 2010 Jun; 20(6):1384-95. PubMed ID: 20033178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive value for malignancy of suspicious breast masses of BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 using ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging.
Satake H; Nishio A; Ikeda M; Ishigaki S; Shimamoto K; Hirano M; Naganawa S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):202-9. PubMed ID: 21178068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Kamitani T; Setoguchi T; Okafuji T; Soeda H; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Tokunaga E; Yamamoto H; Honda H
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e126-32. PubMed ID: 19796900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiomic analysis of HTR-DCE MR sequences improves diagnostic performance compared to BI-RADS analysis of breast MR lesions.
Perre SV; Duron L; Milon A; Bekhouche A; Balvay D; Cornelis FH; Fournier L; Thomassin-Naggara I
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):4848-4859. PubMed ID: 33404696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement.
Gutierrez RL; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Kurland BF; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):994-1000. PubMed ID: 19770321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography: improved lesion detection and differentiation with gadobenate dimeglumine.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Padula S; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Kirchin MA; Pirovano G; Passariello R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1339-46. PubMed ID: 18941066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.
Kuhl CK; Schild HH; Morakkabati N
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):789-800. PubMed ID: 16118161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative DWI implemented after DCE-MRI yields increased specificity for BI-RADS 3 and 4 breast lesions.
Dijkstra H; Dorrius MD; Wielema M; Pijnappel RM; Oudkerk M; Sijens PE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1642-1649. PubMed ID: 27273694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast.
Baum F; Fischer U; Vosshenrich R; Grabbe E
Eur Radiol; 2002 May; 12(5):1087-92. PubMed ID: 11976850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI.
Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U; Newstead GM
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2878-87. PubMed ID: 16964864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
