299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19727794)
1. The influence of refractive errors on IOP measurement by rebound tonometry (ICare) and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Avitabile T; Longo A; Rocca D; Amato R; Gagliano C; Castaing M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 248(4):585-91. PubMed ID: 19727794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Brusini P
Eye (Lond); 2011 May; 25(5):642-50. PubMed ID: 21436848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Agreement of Intraocular Pressure Measurement of Icare ic200 with Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Adult Eyes with Normal Cornea.
Badakere SV; Chary R; Choudhari NS; Rao HL; Garudadri C; Senthil S
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2021; 4(3):238-243. PubMed ID: 34030826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement of Intraocular Pressure Measurement of Icare ic200 with Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Adult Eyes with Normal Cornea.
Badakere SV; Chary R; Choudhari NS; Rao HL; Garudadri C; Senthil S
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2021; 4(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 32801019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.
Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K
BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: rebound versus goldmann applanation tonometry.
Fuest M; Mamas N; Walter P; Plange N
Curr Eye Res; 2014 Sep; 39(9):902-7. PubMed ID: 24588266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in glaucomatous and ocular hypertensive eyes.
Marini M; Da Pozzo S; Accardo A; Canziani T
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 20890884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure and comparison of Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Mansoori T; Balakrishna N
Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 29044716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects.
Güler M; Bilak Ş; Bilgin B; Şimşek A; Çapkin M; Hakim Reyhan A
J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 25264986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus.
Özcura F; Yıldırım N; Tambova E; Şahin A
J Optom; 2017; 10(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 27402573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical evaluation of the dynamic rebound tonometer Icare].
Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Detry MB; Pourjavan S; Charlier L; Dethinne B; Huge L; Ledoux A
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2006 Dec; 29(10):1119-27. PubMed ID: 17211320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness.
Poostchi A; Mitchell R; Nicholas S; Purdie G; Wells A
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 37(7):687-91. PubMed ID: 19788665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
Gao F; Liu X; Zhao Q; Pan Y
Exp Ther Med; 2017 May; 13(5):1912-1916. PubMed ID: 28565785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Pakrou N; Gray T; Mills R; Landers J; Craig J
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18303384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comprasion of ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in high myopia.
Cagatay HH; Ekinci M; Yazar Z; Gokce G; Ceylan E
ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():869460. PubMed ID: 25379549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
Salim S; Du H; Wan J
J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 23542696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Rebound tonometry in a clinical setting. Comparison with applanation tonometry].
López-Caballero C; Contreras I; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Rebolleda G; Cabrejas L; Marcelo P
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2007 May; 82(5):273-8. PubMed ID: 17516263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure relationship in eyes with and without previous LASIK: comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer with pneumatonometer.
Bayraktar S; Bayraktar Z
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 15751244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of intraocular pressure measurement between Goldman applanation tonometer, rebound tonometer, non-contact tonometer, and its correlation with central corneal thickness.
Porwal AC; Shrishrimal M; Punamia RP; Mathew BC
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 71(5):1927-1931. PubMed ID: 37203058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
