These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19727794)
41. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting. Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Yang MK; Kim DM Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and their relationship to corneal properties, refractive error, and ocular pulse amplitude. Erickson DH; Goodwin D; Rollins M; Belaustegui A; Anderson C Optometry; 2009 Apr; 80(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 19329059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Influence of central corneal thickness on measured intraocular pressure differentials: Nidek RKT-7700, Topcon CT-80 NCTs and Goldmann Tonometer. Ogbuehi KC; Mucke S; Osuagwu UL Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 23009324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Measuring intraocular pressure after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation with rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Arribas-Pardo P; Mendez-Hernandez C; Cuiña-Sardiña R; Fernandez-Perez C; Diaz-Valle D; Garcia-Feijoo J Cornea; 2015 May; 34(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 25826325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Comparison between Goldmann, Icare Pro and Corvis ST tonometry]. Bañeros-Rojas P; Martinez de la Casa JM; Arribas-Pardo P; Berrozpe-Villabona C; Toro-Utrera P; García-Feijoó J Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2014 Jul; 89(7):260-4. PubMed ID: 24814401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals. Kamel K; Dervan E; Falzon K; O'Brien C Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 188(1):321-325. PubMed ID: 29616408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measured with three different tonometers. Murase H; Sawada A; Mochizuki K; Yamamoto T Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 53(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19184301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of the Icare ic100 Rebound Tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in 1,000 Eyes. Subramaniam AG; Allen P; Toh T Ophthalmic Res; 2021; 64(2):321-326. PubMed ID: 32906125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Inter-optometrist variability of IOP measurement for modern tonometers and their agreement with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Campbell P; Edgar DF; Shah R Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Jul; 104(5):602-610. PubMed ID: 33689641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. A new rebound tonometer for home monitoring of intraocular pressure. Rosentreter A; Jablonski KS; Mellein AC; Gaki S; Hueber A; Dietlein TS Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 249(11):1713-9. PubMed ID: 21842435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Tonometry after Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for Keratoconus. Arribas-Pardo P; Mendez-Hernandez C; Cuiña-Sardiña R; Benitez-Del-Castillo JM; Garcia-Feijoo J Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Oct; 94(10):986-992. PubMed ID: 28858044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties. Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Oh JH; Yoo C; Kim YY; Kim HM; Song JS Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 247(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 18843499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Influence of LASEK on Schiøtz, Goldmann and dynamic contour Tonometry. Sales-Sanz M; Arranz-Marquez E; Arruabarrena C; Teus MA Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 256(1):173-179. PubMed ID: 29032414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A comparison of goldmann applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry measurements among patients attending a glaucoma clinic in Southwest Nigeria. Ashano O; Oderinlo O; Ogunro A; Ashano E Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Sep; 25(9):1542-1547. PubMed ID: 36149217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Tonnu PA; Ho T; Newson T; El Sheikh A; Sharma K; White E; Bunce C; Garway-Heath D Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 89(7):851-4. PubMed ID: 15965165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer. Brown L; Foulsham W; Pronin S; Tatham AJ J Glaucoma; 2018 Jun; 27(6):511-518. PubMed ID: 29557828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A comparison of intraocular pressure values obtained using a Goldmann applanation tonometer and a handheld version of applanation resonance tonometer: A preliminary report. Mulak M; Czak WA; Mimier M; Kaczmarek R Adv Clin Exp Med; 2018 Apr; 27(4):481-485. PubMed ID: 29558028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry. Kaufmann C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3118-21. PubMed ID: 15326129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]