386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19728216)
1. Two ATS recommended protocols for administration of methacholine are not equal.
Burke RR; Obeid IM; Williams LK; Morris ZQ
J Asthma; 2009 Sep; 46(7):740-4. PubMed ID: 19728216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of challenge method on sensitivity, reactivity, and maximal response to methacholine.
Prieto L; Ferrer A; Domenech J; Pérez-Francés C
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2006 Aug; 97(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16937747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The FEF25-75 and its decline as a predictor of methacholine responsiveness in children.
Drewek R; Garber E; Stanclik S; Simpson P; Nugent M; Gershan W
J Asthma; 2009 May; 46(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 19484673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of methacholine and adenosine inhalation challenge in patients with suspected asthma.
Pedrosa M; Barranco P; Caminoa M; Botello MD; Quirce S
J Asthma; 2009 Oct; 46(8):773-6. PubMed ID: 19863279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determinants of airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in school-age children with asthma.
Bakirtas A; Turktas I
Pediatr Pulmonol; 2006 Jun; 41(6):515-21. PubMed ID: 16617445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimeter methacholine challenge: comparison of maximal versus submaximal inhalations.
Todd DC; Davis BE; Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Sep; 114(3):517-9. PubMed ID: 15356550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose versus concentration of methacholine.
Drotar DE; Davis BE; Cockcroft DW
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1999 Sep; 83(3):229-30. PubMed ID: 10507268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Airway responsiveness as a direct factor contributing to the dyspnoea perception in asthma.
Koh YI; Choi IS; Lim H
Respir Med; 2001 Jun; 95(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 11421503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a 1-concentration-4-step dosimeter protocol for methacholine testing.
Merget R; Jörres RA; Heinze E; Haufs MG; Taeger D; Brüning T
Respir Med; 2009 Apr; 103(4):607-13. PubMed ID: 19010655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The bronchoprotective effect of inhaling methacholine by using total lung capacity inspirations has a marked influence on the interpretation of the test result.
Cockcroft DW; Davis BE
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2006 Jun; 117(6):1244-8. PubMed ID: 16750982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Difference between dosimeter and tidal breathing methacholine challenge: contributions of dose and deep inspiration bronchoprotection.
Allen ND; Davis BE; Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW
Chest; 2005 Dec; 128(6):4018-23. PubMed ID: 16354875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 should be used to interpret methacholine challenge tests with modern nebulizers.
Dell SD; Bola SS; Foty RG; Marshall LC; Nelligan KA; Coates AL
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Mar; 12(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 25575246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of mouth occlusion pressure to evaluate the effect of an initial inhalation of nebulized saline in methacholine challenge.
García-Río F; Pino JM; Racionero MA; Gómez de Terreros Caro J; Prados C; Alvarez-Sala R; Villamor J
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 1996; 24(3):125-8. PubMed ID: 8766744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Agreement between tracheal auscultation and pulmonary function in methacholine bronchial inhalation challenge in asthmatic children].
de Frutos Martínez C; González Pérez-Yarza E; Aldasoro Ruiz A; Emparanza Knörr JI; Callén Blecua M; Mintegui Aramburu J
An Esp Pediatr; 2002 Apr; 56(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 11927097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of sensitivity and specifity of two bronchial provocation tests with methacholine and hypertonic saline in bronchial hyperreactivity evaluation in asthmatics].
Piotrowska T; Siergiejko G; Siergiejko Z
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2007 Feb; 22(128):126-9. PubMed ID: 17598657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Specific conductance criteria for a positive methacholine challenge test: are the American Thoracic Society guidelines rather generous?
Khalid I; Morris ZQ; Digiovine B
Respir Care; 2009 Sep; 54(9):1168-74. PubMed ID: 19712492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 between the AeroEclipse II breath-actuated nebulizer and the wright nebulizer in adult subjects with asthma.
El-Gammal AI; Killian KJ; Scime TX; Beaudin S; Schlatman A; Cockcroft DW; Gauvreau GM
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Jul; 12(7):1039-43. PubMed ID: 25871542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of 2 methods of continuous aerosol administration during methacholine challenge testing.
Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW; Hannah VD; Davis BE
Respir Care; 2006 Jan; 51(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 16381617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in the response to methacholine between the tidal breathing and dosimeter methods: influence of the dose of bronchoconstrictor agent delivered to the mouth.
Prieto L; Lopez V; Llusar R; Rojas R; Marin J
Chest; 2008 Oct; 134(4):699-703. PubMed ID: 18625670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of obesity on breathlessness and airway responsiveness to methacholine in non-asthmatic subjects.
Salome CM; Munoz PA; Berend N; Thorpe CW; Schachter LM; King GG
Int J Obes (Lond); 2008 Mar; 32(3):502-9. PubMed ID: 17955030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
