These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. The causal structure of utility conditionals. Bonnefon JF; Sloman SA Cogn Sci; 2013; 37(1):193-209. PubMed ID: 23163750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Direct evidence for a dual process model of deductive inference. Markovits H; Brunet ML; Thompson V; Brisson J J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1213-22. PubMed ID: 23206167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Recomposing a fragmented literature: how conditional and relational arguments engage different neural systems for deductive reasoning. Prado J; Van Der Henst JB; Noveck IA Neuroimage; 2010 Jul; 51(3):1213-21. PubMed ID: 20302951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Belief inhibition during thinking: not always winning but at least taking part. De Neys W; Franssens S Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):45-61. PubMed ID: 19703685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Politeness and conditional reasoning: interpersonal cues to the indirect suppression of deductive inferences. Demeure V; Bonnefon JF; Raufaste E J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):260-6. PubMed ID: 19210096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The mental representation of causal conditional reasoning: mental models or causal models. Ali N; Chater N; Oaksford M Cognition; 2011 Jun; 119(3):403-18. PubMed ID: 21392739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Threat-confirming belief bias and symptoms of anxiety disorders. Vroling MS; de Jong PJ J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2010 Jun; 41(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 19942212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Outcome value influences attentional biases in human associative learning: dissociable effects of training and instruction. Le Pelley ME; Mitchell CJ; Johnson AM J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jan; 39(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 23316975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Interactions between inferential strategies and belief bias. Markovits H; Brisson J; de Chantal PL; Thompson VA Mem Cognit; 2017 Oct; 45(7):1182-1192. PubMed ID: 28608194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Modulation of the cortical false belief network during development. Sommer M; Meinhardt J; Eichenmüller K; Sodian B; Döhnel K; Hajak G Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():123-31. PubMed ID: 20678489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of a looker's past reliability on infants' reasoning about beliefs. Poulin-Dubois D; Chow V Dev Psychol; 2009 Nov; 45(6):1576-82. PubMed ID: 19899915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Individual differences in working memory capacity and resistance to belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Robison MK; Unsworth N Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1471-1484. PubMed ID: 27173000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Neural correlates of true and false belief reasoning. Sommer M; Döhnel K; Sodian B; Meinhardt J; Thoermer C; Hajak G Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(3):1378-84. PubMed ID: 17376703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Working memory capacity and the construction of spatial mental models in comprehension and deductive reasoning. Oberauer K; Weidenfeld A; Hörnig R Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):426-47. PubMed ID: 16618644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Stanovich KE; West RF J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):672-95. PubMed ID: 18361678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The difference between generating counter examples and using them during reasoning. Verschueren N; Schaeken W; De Neys W; d'Ydewalle G Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1285-308. PubMed ID: 15513247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]