135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19728227)
1. The specific-word frequency effect in speech production: evidence from Spanish and French.
Cuetos F; Bonin P; Alameda JR; Caramazza A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):750-71. PubMed ID: 19728227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The specific-word frequency effect: implications for the representation of homophones in speech production.
Caramazza A; Costa A; Miozzo M; Bi Y
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Nov; 27(6):1430-50. PubMed ID: 11713878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The representation of homophones: evidence from the distractor-frequency effect.
Miozzo M; Caramazza A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1360-71. PubMed ID: 16393051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What determines the speed of lexical access: homophone or specific-word frequency? A reply to Jescheniak et al. (2003).
Caramazza A; Bi Y; Costa A; Miozzo M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):278-82. PubMed ID: 14736312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Homographic and heterographic homophones in speech production: does orthography matter?
Biedermann B; Nickels L
Cortex; 2008 Jun; 44(6):683-97. PubMed ID: 18472038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tracking lexical access in speech production: electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects.
Strijkers K; Costa A; Thierry G
Cereb Cortex; 2010 Apr; 20(4):912-28. PubMed ID: 19679542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recognition of interlingual homophones in bilingual auditory word recognition.
Schulpen B; Dijkstra T; Schriefers HJ; Hasper M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Dec; 29(6):1155-78. PubMed ID: 14640836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does word frequency affect lexical selection in speech production?
Navarrete E; Basagni B; Alario FX; Costa A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Oct; 59(10):1681-90. PubMed ID: 16945853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The word frequency effect in picture naming: contrasting two hypotheses using homonym pictures.
Shatzman KB; Schiller NO
Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):160-9. PubMed ID: 15172534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Homophone effects in visual word recognition depend on homophone type and task demands.
Kerswell L; Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM; Sears CR; Owen WJ
Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 18266508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of lexical expertise in reading homophones.
Burt JS; Jared D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1302-21. PubMed ID: 26158491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Producing and recognizing words with two pronunciation variants: evidence from novel schwa words.
Bürki A; Frauenfelder UH
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):796-824. PubMed ID: 22348434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence for a limited-cascading account of written word naming.
Bonin P; Roux S; Barry C; Canell L
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1741-58. PubMed ID: 22612168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consequences of an inhibition deficit for word production and comprehension: evidence from the semantic blocking paradigm.
Biegler KA; Crowther JE; Martin RC
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008 Jun; 25(4):493-527. PubMed ID: 19086200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The representation of homophones: Evidence from anomia.
Jacobs M; Singer N; Miozzo M
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2004 Dec; 21(8):840-66. PubMed ID: 21038236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The activation of phonological representations by bilinguals while reading silently: evidence from interlingual homophones.
Haigh CA; Jared D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):623-44. PubMed ID: 17576144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A rose by any other name is not the same: the role of orthographic knowledge in homophone confusion errors.
Starr MS; Fleming KK
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):744-60. PubMed ID: 11394678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Naming pseudowords in Spanish: effects of syllable frequency.
Carreiras M; Perea M
Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):393-400. PubMed ID: 15172555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Specific-word frequency is not all that counts in speech production: comments on Caramazza, Costa, et al. (2001) and new experimental data.
Jescheniak JD; Meyer AS; Levelt WJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 May; 29(3):432-8. PubMed ID: 12776753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age-related influences on lexical selection and orthographic encoding during homophone spelling.
White KK; Abrams L; Palm GM; Protasi MA
Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 21787089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
