These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
544 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19730210)
1. Effect of nucleus replacement device properties on lumbar spine mechanics. Rundell SA; Guerin HL; Auerbach JD; Kurtz SM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2022-32. PubMed ID: 19730210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The restoration of lumbar intervertebral disc load distribution: a comparison of three nucleus replacement technologies. Dahl MC; Ahrens M; Sherman JE; Martz EO Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul; 35(15):1445-53. PubMed ID: 20216342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis. Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Restoration of compressive loading properties of lumbar discs with a nucleus implant-a finite element analysis study. Strange DG; Fisher ST; Boughton PC; Kishen TJ; Diwan AD Spine J; 2010 Jul; 10(7):602-9. PubMed ID: 20547110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis. Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains. Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Numerical analysis of the influence of nucleus pulposus removal on the biomechanical behavior of a lumbar motion segment. Huang J; Yan H; Jian F; Wang X; Li H Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(14):1516-24. PubMed ID: 24893132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of an artificial disc on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study. Rohlmann A; Mann A; Zander T; Bergmann G Eur Spine J; 2009 Jan; 18(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 19043744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement. Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the segmental motion and intradiscal pressure at the adjacent level: an in vitro biomechanical study: presented at the 2008 Joint Spine Section Meeting Laboratory investigation. Ingalhalikar AV; Reddy CG; Lim TH; Torner JC; Hitchon PW J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 19951025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of different design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the range of motion, facet joint forces and instantaneous center of rotation of a L4-5 segment. Schmidt H; Midderhoff S; Adkins K; Wilke HJ Eur Spine J; 2009 Nov; 18(11):1695-1705. PubMed ID: 19763638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical changes of degenerated adjacent segment and intact lumbar spine after lumbosacral topping-off surgery: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Cao L; Liu Y; Mei W; Xu J; Zhan S BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Feb; 21(1):104. PubMed ID: 32061252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement. Tournier C; Aunoble S; Le Huec JC; Lemaire JP; Tropiano P; Lafage V; Skalli W Eur Spine J; 2007 Mar; 16(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 16960704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of total disc replacement with ProDisc on intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Rohlmann A; Zander T; Bergmann G Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(7):738-43. PubMed ID: 15803074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. Rohlmann A; Burra NK; Zander T; Bergmann G Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1223-31. PubMed ID: 17206401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament. McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does anterior lumbar interbody fusion promote adjacent degeneration in degenerative disc disease? A finite element study. Tang S; Rebholz BJ J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 21311928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical investigation on the influence of the regional material degeneration of an intervertebral disc in a lower lumbar spinal unit: A finite element study. Masni-Azian ; Tanaka M Comput Biol Med; 2018 Jul; 98():26-38. PubMed ID: 29758454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system. Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]