547 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19730210)
1. Effect of nucleus replacement device properties on lumbar spine mechanics.
Rundell SA; Guerin HL; Auerbach JD; Kurtz SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2022-32. PubMed ID: 19730210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The restoration of lumbar intervertebral disc load distribution: a comparison of three nucleus replacement technologies.
Dahl MC; Ahrens M; Sherman JE; Martz EO
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul; 35(15):1445-53. PubMed ID: 20216342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Restoration of compressive loading properties of lumbar discs with a nucleus implant-a finite element analysis study.
Strange DG; Fisher ST; Boughton PC; Kishen TJ; Diwan AD
Spine J; 2010 Jul; 10(7):602-9. PubMed ID: 20547110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Numerical analysis of the influence of nucleus pulposus removal on the biomechanical behavior of a lumbar motion segment.
Huang J; Yan H; Jian F; Wang X; Li H
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(14):1516-24. PubMed ID: 24893132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of an artificial disc on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study.
Rohlmann A; Mann A; Zander T; Bergmann G
Eur Spine J; 2009 Jan; 18(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 19043744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the segmental motion and intradiscal pressure at the adjacent level: an in vitro biomechanical study: presented at the 2008 Joint Spine Section Meeting Laboratory investigation.
Ingalhalikar AV; Reddy CG; Lim TH; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 19951025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of different design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the range of motion, facet joint forces and instantaneous center of rotation of a L4-5 segment.
Schmidt H; Midderhoff S; Adkins K; Wilke HJ
Eur Spine J; 2009 Nov; 18(11):1695-1705. PubMed ID: 19763638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical changes of degenerated adjacent segment and intact lumbar spine after lumbosacral topping-off surgery: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Cao L; Liu Y; Mei W; Xu J; Zhan S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Feb; 21(1):104. PubMed ID: 32061252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement.
Tournier C; Aunoble S; Le Huec JC; Lemaire JP; Tropiano P; Lafage V; Skalli W
Eur Spine J; 2007 Mar; 16(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 16960704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of total disc replacement with ProDisc on intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine.
Rohlmann A; Zander T; Bergmann G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(7):738-43. PubMed ID: 15803074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
Rohlmann A; Burra NK; Zander T; Bergmann G
Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1223-31. PubMed ID: 17206401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does anterior lumbar interbody fusion promote adjacent degeneration in degenerative disc disease? A finite element study.
Tang S; Rebholz BJ
J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 21311928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical investigation on the influence of the regional material degeneration of an intervertebral disc in a lower lumbar spinal unit: A finite element study.
Masni-Azian ; Tanaka M
Comput Biol Med; 2018 Jul; 98():26-38. PubMed ID: 29758454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
