BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19730215)

  • 1. Predicting SF-6D utility scores from the Oswestry disability index and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain.
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; McDonough CM; Rampersaud R; Berven S; Shainline M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2085-9. PubMed ID: 19730215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting SF-6D utility scores from the neck disability index and numeric rating scales for neck and arm pain.
    Carreon LY; Anderson PA; McDonough CM; Djurasovic M; Glassman SD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Mar; 36(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 20847713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating EQ-5D values from the Oswestry Disability Index and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain.
    Carreon LY; Bratcher KR; Das N; Nienhuis JB; Glassman SD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Apr; 39(8):678-82. PubMed ID: 24480944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data.
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; McGirt MJ; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jun; 24(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 26895529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating EQ-5D values from the Neck Disability Index and numeric rating scales for neck and arm pain.
    Carreon LY; Bratcher KR; Das N; Nienhuis JB; Glassman SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 24905392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the EuroQOL-5D with the Oswestry Disability Index, back and leg pain scores in patients with degenerative lumbar spine pathology.
    Mueller B; Carreon LY; Glassman SD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(9):757-61. PubMed ID: 23124265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of a model for translation of the Neck Disability Index to utility scores for cost-utility analysis in cervical disorders.
    Richardson SS; Berven S
    Spine J; 2012 Jan; 12(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 22209244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differentiating minimum clinically important difference for primary and revision lumbar fusion surgeries.
    Carreon LY; Bratcher KR; Canan CE; Burke LO; Djurasovic M; Glassman SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jan; 18(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 23157276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can the anxiety domain of EQ-5D and mental health items from SF-36 help predict outcomes after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders?
    Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Owens RK; Crawford CH; Puno RM; Bratcher KR; McGraw KE; Glassman SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Sep; 25(3):352-6. PubMed ID: 27153141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
    McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SF-6D values stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
    Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Canan CE; Burke LO; Glassman SD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E804-8. PubMed ID: 22228327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in the Oswestry Disability Index that predict improvement after lumbar fusion.
    Djurasovic M; Glassman SD; Dimar JR; Crawford CH; Bratcher KR; Carreon LY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Nov; 17(5):486-90. PubMed ID: 22998402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of PROMIS Physical Function in MIS TLIF: 2-Year Follow-up.
    Jenkins NW; Parrish JM; Cha EDK; Lynch CP; Sayari AJ; Geoghegan CE; Jadczak CN; Mohan S; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Nov; 45(22):E1516-E1522. PubMed ID: 32756287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):234-241. PubMed ID: 30544348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlations Between the SF-36, the Oswestry-Disability Index and Rolland-Morris Disability Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Decompression According to Types of Spine Origin Pain.
    Ko S; Chae S
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):E804-E808. PubMed ID: 27662270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The discriminative properties of the SF-6D compared with the SF-36 and ODI.
    Carreon LY; Berven SH; Djurasovic M; Bratcher KR; Glassman SD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jan; 38(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 22648033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.