BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19730306)

  • 1. Le Fort III distraction: Part I. Controlling position and vectors of the midface segment.
    Shetye PR; Giannoutsos E; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Sep; 124(3):871-878. PubMed ID: 19730306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Le Fort III distraction: controlling position and path of the osteotomized midface segment on a rigid platform.
    Shetye PR; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1118-21. PubMed ID: 20613597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vector control in internal midface distraction using temporary anchorage devices.
    Francis C; Rommer E; Mancho S; Carey J; Hammoudeh JA; Urata MM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2000-3. PubMed ID: 23154368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Le Fort III Distraction With Internal vs External Distractors: A Cephalometric Analysis.
    Robertson KJ; Mendez BM; Bruce WJ; McDonnell BD; Chiodo MV; Patel PA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 May; 55(5):721-727. PubMed ID: 29589980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional position changes of the midface following Le Fort III advancement in syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Bouw FP; Nout E; van Bezooijen JS; Koudstaal MJ; Veenland JF; Wolvius EB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 43(6):820-4. PubMed ID: 26026886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual midfacial distraction osteogenesis: Le Fort III minus I and Le Fort I for syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Satoh K; Mitsukawa N; Hosaka Y
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Mar; 111(3):1019-28. PubMed ID: 12621171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Midface correction in patients with Crouzon syndrome is Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with a rigid external distraction device the gold standard?
    Engel M; Berger M; Hoffmann J; Kühle R; Rückschloss T; Ristow O; Freudlsperger C; Kansy K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 47(3):420-430. PubMed ID: 30642732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Le Fort III distraction using rotation advancement of the midface in patients with cleft lip and palate.
    Hettinger PC; Hanson PR; Denny AD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Dec; 132(6):1532-1541. PubMed ID: 24281581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with an external device in syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Wery MF; Nada RM; van der Meulen JJ; Wolvius EB; Ongkosuwito EM
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 53(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 25605236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Achieving differential facial changes with Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis: the use of nasal passenger grafts, cerclage hinges, and segmental movements.
    Hopper RA; Prucz RB; Iamphongsai S
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Dec; 130(6):1281-1288. PubMed ID: 22878478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of three surgical techniques for advancement of the midface in growing children with syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Shetye PR; Davidson EH; Sorkin M; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Sep; 126(3):982-994. PubMed ID: 20811230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical considerations for distraction of the monobloc, Le Fort III, and Le Fort I segments.
    Figueroa AA; Polley JW; Figueroa AD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Sep; 126(3):1005-1013. PubMed ID: 20811232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A 10-year study of skeletal stability and growth of the midface following Le Fort III advancement in syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Shetye PR; Kapadia H; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Sep; 126(3):973-981. PubMed ID: 20463620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Le Fort II Distraction with Simultaneous Zygomatic Repositioning.
    Hopper RA; Wang HD; Mercan E
    Clin Plast Surg; 2021 Jul; 48(3):487-496. PubMed ID: 34051900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Le Fort III external midface distraction: surgical outcomes and skeletal stability.
    Iannetti G; Ramieri V; Pagnoni M; Fadda MT; Cascone P
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 May; 23(3):896-900. PubMed ID: 22565921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rotation advancement of the midface by distraction osteogenesis.
    Denny AD; Kalantarian B; Hanson PR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 May; 111(6):1789-99; discussion 1800-3. PubMed ID: 12711938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Normalizing facial ratios in apert syndrome patients with Le Fort II midface distraction and simultaneous zygomatic repositioning.
    Hopper RA; Kapadia H; Morton T
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Jul; 132(1):129-140. PubMed ID: 23508053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proptosis Correction in Pre-Adolescent Patients With Syndromic Craniosynostosis by Le Fort III Distraction Osteogenesis.
    Gibson TL; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG; Shetye PR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 29(6):1535-1541. PubMed ID: 29771833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Le Fort III osteotomy: to distract or not to distract?
    Fearon JA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Apr; 107(5):1091-103; discussion 1104-6. PubMed ID: 11373547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Soft-tissue profile changes following early Le Fort III distraction in growing children with syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Shetye PR; Caterson EJ; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Oct; 132(4):945-954. PubMed ID: 24076685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.