BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19730440)

  • 1. Validation of automated oscillometric versus manual measurement of the ankle-brachial index.
    Richart T; Kuznetsova T; Wizner B; Struijker-Boudier HA; Staessen JA
    Hypertens Res; 2009 Oct; 32(10):884-8. PubMed ID: 19730440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of ankle-brachial index measured by an automated oscillometric apparatus with that by standard Doppler technique in vascular patients.
    Kornø M; Eldrup N; Sillesen H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2009 Nov; 38(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 19751982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated determination of the ankle-brachial index using an oscillometric blood pressure monitor: validation vs. Doppler measurement and cardiovascular risk factor profile.
    Kollias A; Xilomenos A; Protogerou A; Dimakakos E; Stergiou GS
    Hypertens Res; 2011 Jul; 34(7):825-30. PubMed ID: 21593742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of three measures of the ankle-brachial blood pressure index in a general population.
    Pan CR; Staessen JA; Li Y; Wang JG
    Hypertens Res; 2007 Jun; 30(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 17664860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) by using automated oscillometric devices.
    Kawamura T
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2008 May; 90(5):294-8. PubMed ID: 18516397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of peripheral arterial disease with an improved automated device: comparison of a new oscillometric device and the standard Doppler method.
    Špan M; Geršak G; Millasseau SC; Meža M; Košir A
    Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2016; 12():305-11. PubMed ID: 27536125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diastolic versus systolic ankle-brachial pressure index using ultrasound imaging & automated oscillometric measurement in diabetic patients with calcified and non-calcified lower limb arteries.
    Asbeutah AM; AlMajran AA; Asfar SK
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Oct; 16(1):202. PubMed ID: 27784271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and Reliability of the Ankle Brachial Index Measurement Using a Multicuff Oscillometric Device Versus the Doppler Method.
    Ichihashi S; Desormais I; Hashimoto T; Magne J; Kichikawa K; Aboyans V
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2020 Sep; 60(3):462-468. PubMed ID: 32763120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new efficient trial design for assessing reliability of ankle-brachial index measures by three different observer groups.
    Endres HG; Hucke C; Holland-Letz T; Trampisch HJ
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2006 Jul; 6():33. PubMed ID: 16872534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Advances in noninvasive measurement of ankle-brachial index].
    Liu B; Liu K; Zhu H
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 26(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 19813640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducibility and reliability of the ankle-brachial index as assessed by vascular experts, family physicians and nurses.
    Holland-Letz T; Endres HG; Biedermann S; Mahn M; Kunert J; Groh S; Pittrow D; von Bilderling P; Sternitzky R; Diehm C
    Vasc Med; 2007 May; 12(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 17615798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of a new method of detecting peripheral artery disease by determination of ankle-brachial index using an automatic blood pressure device.
    Benchimol A; Bernard V; Pillois X; Hong NT; Benchimol D; Bonnet J
    Angiology; 2004; 55(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 15026866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated oscillometric determination of the ankle-brachial index provides accuracy necessary for office practice.
    Beckman JA; Higgins CO; Gerhard-Herman M
    Hypertension; 2006 Jan; 47(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 16344373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease in general practice: can the ankle-brachial index be measured either by pulse palpation or an automatic blood pressure device?
    Aboyans V; Lacroix P; Doucet S; Preux PM; Criqui MH; Laskar M
    Int J Clin Pract; 2008 Jul; 62(7):1001-7. PubMed ID: 18462371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interobserver variability of ankle-brachial index measurements at rest and post exercise in patients with intermittent claudication.
    van Langen H; van Gurp J; Rubbens L
    Vasc Med; 2009 Aug; 14(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 19651671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a method for determination of the ankle-brachial index in the seated position.
    Gornik HL; Garcia B; Wolski K; Jones DC; Macdonald KA; Fronek A
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Nov; 48(5):1204-10. PubMed ID: 18829231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of the ankle-brachial index using the SCVL(®), an arm and ankle automated device with synchronized cuffs, in a population with increased cardiovascular risk.
    Rosenbaum D; Rodriguez-Carranza S; Laroche P; Bruckert E; Giral P; Girerd X
    Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2012; 8():239-46. PubMed ID: 22566745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Center effect on ankle-brachial index measurement when using the reference method (Doppler and manometer): results from a large cohort study.
    Vierron E; Halimi JM; Tichet J; Balkau B; Cogneau J; Giraudeau B;
    Am J Hypertens; 2009 Jul; 22(7):718-22. PubMed ID: 19407803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oscillometric measurement of ankle-brachial index.
    MacDougall AM; Tandon V; Wilson MP; Wilson TW
    Can J Cardiol; 2008 Jan; 24(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 18209769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated oscillometric measurement of the ankle-brachial index in patients with coronary artery disease.
    Sinski M; Styczynski G; Szmigielski C
    Hypertens Res; 2013 Jan; 36(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 22875071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.