264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19730947)
1. Perioperative outcomes after transition from conventional to minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in a specialized center.
Hamouda AH; Forshaw MJ; Tsigritis K; Jones GE; Noorani AS; Rohatgi A; Botha AJ
Surg Endosc; 2010 Apr; 24(4):865-9. PubMed ID: 19730947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Initial experience of total thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Merritt RE
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012 Apr; 22(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 22393924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Ivor-Lewis vs Sweet esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial.
Li B; Xiang J; Zhang Y; Li H; Zhang J; Sun Y; Hu H; Miao L; Ma L; Luo X; Chen S; Ye T; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Chen H
JAMA Surg; 2015 Apr; 150(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 25650816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Lin J; Kang M; Lin J; Chen S; Deng F; Han W; Lin R
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 25273657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?
Dapri G; Himpens J; Cadière GB
Surg Endosc; 2008 Apr; 22(4):1060-9. PubMed ID: 18071806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A preliminary experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Tapias LF; Morse CR
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 21967644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Could hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy improve the treatment results of esophageal cancer?
Bjelovic M; Babic T; Spica B; Gunjic D; Veselinovic M; Trajkovic G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1196-201. PubMed ID: 27316602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Efficacy comparison of Sweet versus Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the treatment of middle-lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
Yang X; Zhan C; Sun F; Chen L; Shi M; Jiang W; Wang Q
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):979-984. PubMed ID: 27680063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Totally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with single-utility incision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of mid-lower esophageal cancer.
Guo W; Ma L; Zhang Y; Ma X; Yang S; Zhu X; Zhang J; Zhang Y; Xiang J; Li H
Dis Esophagus; 2016; 29(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 25515694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic transhiatal inversion esophagectomy compare favorably with those of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy.
Perry KA; Enestvedt CK; Diggs BS; Jobe BA; Hunter JG
Surg Endosc; 2009 Sep; 23(9):2147-54. PubMed ID: 19116744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.
Sihag S; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Lanuti M; Allan JS; Mathisen DJ; Morse CR
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 42(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 22345284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Noble F; Kelly JJ; Bailey IS; Byrne JP; Underwood TJ;
Dis Esophagus; 2013 Apr; 26(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 23551569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.
Salem AI; Thau MR; Strom TJ; Abbott AM; Saeed N; Almhanna K; Hoffe SE; Shridhar R; Karl RC; Meredith KL
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 27149640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: initial experience from China.
Li H; Hu B; You B; Miao JB; Fu YL; Chen QR
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Apr; 125(8):1376-80. PubMed ID: 22613638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A successful clinical pathway protocol for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Merritt RE; Kneuertz PJ; D'Souza DM; Perry KA
Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1696-1703. PubMed ID: 31286257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and left transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Wang Q; Wu Z; Zhan T; Fang S; Zhang S; Shen G; Wu M
BMC Cancer; 2019 May; 19(1):500. PubMed ID: 31132995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: results of a prospective phase II multicenter trial-the eastern cooperative oncology group (E2202) study.
Luketich JD; Pennathur A; Franchetti Y; Catalano PJ; Swanson S; Sugarbaker DJ; De Hoyos A; Maddaus MA; Nguyen NT; Benson AB; Fernando HC
Ann Surg; 2015 Apr; 261(4):702-7. PubMed ID: 25575253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]