These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19730950)
21. Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review. Cooper MA; Hutfless S; Segev DL; Ibrahim A; Lyu H; Makary MA BMJ; 2014 Jul; 349():g4198. PubMed ID: 25005264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Do the advantages of a minimally invasive approach remain in complex colorectal procedures? A nationwide comparison. Schlussel AT; Lustik MB; Johnson EK; Maykel JA; Champagne BJ; Goldberg JE; Steele SR Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Apr; 58(4):431-43. PubMed ID: 25751800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classifications 3 and 4: the minimally invasive approach is associated with significantly quicker recovery and reduced costs. da Luz Moreira A; Kiran RP; Kirat HT; Remzi FH; Geisler DP; Church JM; Garofalo T; Fazio VW Surg Endosc; 2010 Jun; 24(6):1280-6. PubMed ID: 20033728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era. Tyler JA; Fox JP; Desai MM; Perry WB; Glasgow SC Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Apr; 56(4):458-66. PubMed ID: 23478613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Trends of complications and innovative techniques' utilization for colectomies in the United States. Abd El Aziz MA; Grass F; Behm KT; Shawki S; D'Angelo AL; Mathis KL; Larson DW Updates Surg; 2021 Feb; 73(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 32772277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Is laparoscopic better than open appendectomy? Apelgren KN; Molnar RG; Kisala JM Surg Endosc; 1992; 6(6):298-301. PubMed ID: 1448750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Variation in the Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgical Operations. Kuo LE; Murayama K; Simmons KD; Kelz RR Ann Surg; 2017 Mar; 265(3):514-520. PubMed ID: 28169926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Minimally invasive surgery and its impact on 30-day postoperative complications, unplanned readmissions and mortality. Sood A; Meyer CP; Abdollah F; Sammon JD; Sun M; Lipsitz SR; Hollis M; Weissman JS; Menon M; Trinh QD Br J Surg; 2017 Sep; 104(10):1372-1381. PubMed ID: 28632890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume. Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience. Wang X; Zhang W; Yang X; Shao J; Zhou X; Yuan J J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Oct; 44(10):1924-7. PubMed ID: 19853748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy versus open: a study in 1999 pregnant patients. Cox TC; Huntington CR; Blair LJ; Prasad T; Lincourt AE; Augenstein VA; Heniford BT Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):593-602. PubMed ID: 26091987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care. Warren L; Ladapo JA; Borah BJ; Gunnarsson CL J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 19835801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Outcome comparison between laparoscopic and open appendectomy: evidence from a nationwide population-based study. Wang CC; Tu CC; Wang PC; Lin HC; Wei PL PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e68662. PubMed ID: 23874710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open colectomy for colon cancer. Papageorge CM; Zhao Q; Foley EF; Harms BA; Heise CP; Carchman EH; Kennedy GD J Surg Res; 2016 Jul; 204(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 27451872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Use of minimally invasive surgery in emergency general surgery procedures. Arnold M; Elhage S; Schiffern L; Lauren Paton B; Ross SW; Matthews BD; Reinke CE Surg Endosc; 2020 May; 34(5):2258-2265. PubMed ID: 31388806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital. Minutolo V; Licciardello A; Di Stefano B; Arena M; Arena G; Antonacci V BMC Surg; 2014 Mar; 14():14. PubMed ID: 24646120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Guller U; Hervey S; Purves H; Muhlbaier LH; Peterson ED; Eubanks S; Pietrobon R Ann Surg; 2004 Jan; 239(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 14685099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is more favorable for patients with comorbidities, the elderly, and those with complicated appendicitis: a nationwide population-based study. Yeh CC; Wu SC; Liao CC; Su LT; Hsieh CH; Li TC Surg Endosc; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2932-42. PubMed ID: 21424194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]