These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19731189)

  • 1. Similarity is closeness: Metaphorical mapping in a conceptual task.
    Boot I; Pecher D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):942-54. PubMed ID: 19731189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of conceptual processing on familiarity-based recognition.
    Ngo CT; Brown A; Sargent J; Dopkins S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 20384421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On learning to draw the distinction between physical and metaphorical motion: is metaphor an early emerging cognitive and linguistic capacity?
    Ozçalişkan S
    J Child Lang; 2005 May; 32(2):291-318. PubMed ID: 16045252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the concreteness of relational representation.
    Rein JR; Markman AB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1452-65. PubMed ID: 20919782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
    Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similarity on the rebound: inhibition of similarity assessment leads to an ironic postsuppressional rebound.
    Geeraert N; Van Boven L; Yzerbyt VY
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1788-96. PubMed ID: 21526455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exemplar similarity and rule application.
    Hahn U; Prat-Sala M; Pothos EM; Brumby DP
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 19815187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test sequence priming in recognition memory.
    Johns EE; Mewhort DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1162-74. PubMed ID: 19686012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual learning in face processing: comparison facilitates face recognition.
    Dwyer DM; Vladeanu M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):2055-67. PubMed ID: 19235097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks.
    Ansorge U; Wühr P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1216-35. PubMed ID: 19096944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Holistic representation of negative numbers is formed when needed for the task.
    Ganor-Stern D; Pinhas M; Kallai A; Tzelgov J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1969-81. PubMed ID: 20437298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The cerebral basis of mapping nonsymbolic numerical quantities onto abstract symbols: an fMRI training study.
    Lyons IM; Ansari D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1720-35. PubMed ID: 18823231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interplay of orthography and semantics in reading: an event-related potential study.
    Martin CD; Thierry G
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1501-5. PubMed ID: 18797306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: an ERP study.
    Lai VT; Curran T; Menn L
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1284():145-55. PubMed ID: 19505446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contribution of the priming paradigm to the understanding of the conceptual developmental shift from 5 to 9 years of age.
    Perraudin S; Mounoud P
    Dev Sci; 2009 Nov; 12(6):956-77. PubMed ID: 19840051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shape configuration and category-specificity.
    Gerlach C; Law I; Paulson OB
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(7):1247-60. PubMed ID: 16289641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is overall similarity classification less effortful than single-dimension classification?
    Wills AJ; Milton F; Longmore CA; Hester S; Robinson J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):299-318. PubMed ID: 22897383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural similarity and category-specificity: a refined account.
    Gerlach C; Law I; Paulson OB
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1543-53. PubMed ID: 15246291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinguishing familiarity from fluency for the compound word pair effect in associative recognition.
    Ahmad FN; Hockley WE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1768-1791. PubMed ID: 27415965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Featuring familiarity: how a familiar feature instantiation influences categorization.
    Hannah SD; Brooks LR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Dec; 63(4):263-75. PubMed ID: 20025385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.