357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19732053)
1. Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4 + 3 as high or intermediate grade.
Fanning DM; Kay E; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW
BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 19732053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.
Moussa AS; Li J; Soriano M; Klein EA; Dong F; Jones JS
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18782303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends in Gleason score: concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy over 15 years.
Rajinikanth A; Manoharan M; Soloway CT; Civantos FJ; Soloway MS
Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 18279938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic significance of Gleason score discrepancies between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
Müntener M; Epstein JI; Hernandez DJ; Gonzalgo ML; Mangold L; Humphreys E; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Nielsen ME
Eur Urol; 2008 Apr; 53(4):767-75; discussion 775-6. PubMed ID: 18060681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study.
Kvåle R; Møller B; Wahlqvist R; Fosså SD; Berner A; Busch C; Kyrdalen AE; Svindland A; Viset T; Halvorsen OJ
BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(12):1647-54. PubMed ID: 19154461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discrepancies Between Biopsy Gleason Score and Radical Prostatectomy Specimen Gleason Score: An Iranian Experience.
Dolatkhah S; Mirtalebi M; Daneshpajouhnejad P; Barahimi A; Mazdak H; Izadpanahi MH; Mohammadi M; Taheri D
Urol J; 2019 Feb; 16(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 30345499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient risk stratification using Gleason score concordance and upgrading among men with prostate biopsy Gleason score 6 or 7.
Serkin FB; Soderdahl DW; Cullen J; Chen Y; Hernandez J
Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 19117774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved accuracy in predicting the presence of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer by three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy.
Numao N; Kawakami S; Yokoyama M; Yonese J; Arisawa C; Ishikawa Y; Ando M; Fukui I; Kihara K
Eur Urol; 2007 Dec; 52(6):1663-8. PubMed ID: 17240041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is there a relationship between prostate volume and Gleason score?
Mir MC; Planas J; Raventos CX; de Torres IM; Trilla E; Cecchini L; Orsola A; Morote J
BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(5):563-5. PubMed ID: 18476971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Concordance of the Gleason score in prostate multibiopsy and definitive histology].
May M; Brookman-May S; Lebentrau S; Gilfrich C; Loy V; Theissig F; Roigas J; Hoschke B; Burger M; Miller K
Aktuelle Urol; 2010 May; 41(3):184-92. PubMed ID: 20309804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Downgrading of biopsy based Gleason score in prostatectomy specimens.
Treurniet KM; Trudel D; Sykes J; Evans AJ; Finelli A; Van der Kwast TH
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 24403214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical predictors of Gleason score upgrading: implications for patients considering watchful waiting, active surveillance, or brachytherapy.
Kulkarni GS; Lockwood G; Evans A; Toi A; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Finelli A; Fleshner NE
Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(12):2432-8. PubMed ID: 17497649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trends in distribution and prognostic significance of Gleason grades on radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens between 1989 and 2001.
Sengupta S; Slezak JM; Blute ML; Leibovich BC; Sebo TJ; Myers RP; Cheville JC; Bergstralh EJ; Zincke H
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(12):2630-5. PubMed ID: 16703592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Upgrading the Gleason score in extended prostate biopsy: implications for treatment choice.
Moreira Leite KR; Camara-Lopes LH; Dall'Oglio MF; Cury J; Antunes AA; Sañudo A; Srougi M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Feb; 73(2):353-6. PubMed ID: 18774658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
