These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Modeling surface water-groundwater interaction with MODFLOW: some considerations. Brunner P; Simmons CT; Cook PG; Therrien R Ground Water; 2010; 48(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 19891721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simulating piecewise-linear surface water and ground water interactions with MODFLOW. Zaadnoordijk WJ Ground Water; 2009; 47(5):723-6. PubMed ID: 19473274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting collector well yields with MODFLOW. Kelson V Ground Water; 2012; 50(6):918-26. PubMed ID: 22339406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using MODFLOW 2000 to model ET and recharge for shallow ground water problems. Doble RC; Simmons CT; Walker GR Ground Water; 2009; 47(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 18624693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of piezometer construction on groundwater sampling in fractured rock. Kozuskanich J; Novakowski KS; Anderson BC Ground Water; 2012; 50(2):266-78. PubMed ID: 21797851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uniform head in horizontal and vertical wells. Steward DR; Jin W Ground Water; 2006; 44(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 16405471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simple automatic time-stepping for improved simulation of groundwater hydrographs. Jackson CR Ground Water; 2012; 50(5):736-45. PubMed ID: 22188259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modifications to the Conduit Flow Process Mode 2 for MODFLOW-2005. Reimann T; Birk S; Rehrl C; Shoemaker WB Ground Water; 2012; 50(1):144-8. PubMed ID: 21371024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Locating monitoring wells in groundwater systems using embedded optimization and simulation models. Bashi-Azghadi SN; Kerachian R Sci Total Environ; 2010 Apr; 408(10):2189-98. PubMed ID: 20189633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using radon-222 for tracing groundwater discharge into an open-pit lignite mining lake--a case study. Schmidt A; Schubert M Isotopes Environ Health Stud; 2007 Dec; 43(4):387-400. PubMed ID: 18041626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of temporally variable groundwater flow conditions on point measurements and contaminant mass flux estimations. Rein A; Bauer S; Dietrich P; Beyer C J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Sep; 108(3-4):118-33. PubMed ID: 19682766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple well-shutdown tests and site-scale flow simulation in fractured rocks. Tiedeman CR; Lacombe PJ; Goode DJ Ground Water; 2010; 48(3):401-15. PubMed ID: 20002208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Natural recharge to sustainable yield from the barind aquifer: a tool in preparing effective management plan of groundwater resources. Monirul Islam M; Kanungoe P Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(12):251-8. PubMed ID: 16477993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parallelization of MODFLOW using a GPU library. Ji X; Li D; Cheng T; Wang XS; Wang Q Ground Water; 2014; 52(4):618-23. PubMed ID: 23937315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A reactor model for pulsed pumping groundwater remediation. Tenney CM; Lastoskie CM; Dybas MJ Water Res; 2004 Nov; 38(18):3869-80. PubMed ID: 15380977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new package in MODFLOW to simulate unconfined groundwater flow in sloping aquifers. Wang Q; Zhan H; Tang Z Ground Water; 2014; 52(6):924-35. PubMed ID: 24299562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Linking MODFLOW with an agent-based land-use model to support decision making. Reeves HW; Zellner ML Ground Water; 2010; 48(5):649-60. PubMed ID: 20132323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]