These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19732161)

  • 21. Improved water table dynamics in MODFLOW.
    Clemo T
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(2):270-3. PubMed ID: 15819948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. "Simulating piecewise-linear surface water and groundwater interactions with MODFLOW," by W.J. Zaadnoordijk, September-October 2009, v. 47, no. 5: 723-726.
    Rushton K
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(6):796-7; discussion 797-8. PubMed ID: 20678142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pulsed pumping process optimization using a potential flow model.
    Tenney CM; Lastoskie CM
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):111-21. PubMed ID: 17350717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nonlinear Flow Process: A New Package to Compute Nonlinear Flow in MODFLOW.
    Mayaud C; Walker P; Hergarten S; Birk S
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(4):645-50. PubMed ID: 25059312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of vertical flows in wells on groundwater sampling.
    McMillan LA; Rivett MO; Tellam JH; Dumble P; Sharp H
    J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Nov; 169():50-61. PubMed ID: 24999176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A hybrid finite-difference and analytic element groundwater model.
    Haitjema HM; Feinstein DT; Hunt RJ; Gusyev MA
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(4):538-48. PubMed ID: 20132324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Controls of wellbore flow regimes on pump effluent composition.
    Martin-Hayden JM; Plummer M; Britt SL
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 23496436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Utilization of decadal tritium variation for assessing the residence time of base flow.
    Rose S
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(3):309-17. PubMed ID: 17470120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Introduction to hydromechanical well tests in fractured rock aquifers.
    Schweisinger T; Svenson EJ; Murdoch LC
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 18823402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of groundwater flow patterns around a dual-screened groundwater circulation well.
    Johnson RL; Simon MA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):188-202. PubMed ID: 17428573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimating hydraulic parameters when poroelastic effects are significant.
    Berg SJ; Hsieh PA; Illman WA
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(6):815-29. PubMed ID: 21204832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Numerical modeling of saline water transport in the lower Nam Kam Basin, Amphoe That Phanom, Changwat Nakhon Phanom, Thailand.
    Srisuk K; Sriboonlue V; Buaphan C; Archvichai L; Youngme W; Satarak P; Jaruchaikul S
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(7):157-64. PubMed ID: 11724482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A compartmental-spatial system dynamics approach to ground water modeling.
    Roach J; Tidwell V
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(5):686-98. PubMed ID: 19459984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of elevation resolution on evapotranspiration simulations using MODFLOW.
    Kambhammettu BV; Schmid W; King JP; Creel BJ
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 21916891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hybrid-optimization algorithm for the management of a conjunctive-use project and well field design.
    Chiu YC; Nishikawa T; Martin P
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(1):103-17. PubMed ID: 21635245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An assembly model for simulation of large-scale ground water flow and transport.
    Huang J; Christ JA; Goltz MN
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(6):882-92. PubMed ID: 18715260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How processing digital elevation models can affect simulated water budgets.
    Kuniansky EL; Lowery MA; Campbell BG
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 18800972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. RIPGIS-NET: a GIS tool for riparian groundwater evapotranspiration in MODFLOW.
    Ajami H; Maddock T; Meixner T; Hogan JF; Guertin DP
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(1):154-8. PubMed ID: 21385181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robust representation of dry cells in single-layer MODFLOW models.
    Painter S; Başağaoğlu H; Liu A
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(6):873-81. PubMed ID: 18715261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A MODFLOW Infiltration Device Package for Simulating Storm Water Infiltration.
    Jeppesen J; Christensen S
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(4):542-9. PubMed ID: 25187115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.