120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19732191)
1. Influence of the cavity-size on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations in primary molars.
Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2009 Nov; 19(6):423-30. PubMed ID: 19732191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of the experience of operator and assistant on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations: two-year results.
Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE; Opinya G
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2009 Dec; 10(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 19995507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short communication: Influence of different isolation methods on the survival of proximal ART restorations in primary molars after two years.
Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE; Opinya GN
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2010 Jun; 11(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 20507811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two years survival rate of Class II ART restorations in primary molars using two ways to avoid saliva contamination.
Carvalho TS; Sampaio FC; Diniz A; Bönecker M; Van Amerongen WE
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 20642474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results.
Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM; Yip HK; Smales RJ
Int Dent J; 2004 Feb; 54(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15005472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations.
Bonifácio CC; Hesse D; Raggio DP; Bönecker M; van Loveren C; van Amerongen WE
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jul; 23(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 22891625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-year survival rates of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in relation to glass ionomer cements and Postrestoration meals consumed.
Kemoli AM; Opinya GN; van Amerongen WE; Mwalili SM
Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 21703078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. One year Survival Rate of Ketac Molar versus Vitro Molar for Occlusoproximal ART Restorations: a RCT.
Anna Luisa de Brito P; Isabel Cristina O; Clarissa Calil B; Ana Flávia Bissoto C; José Carlos Pettorossi I; Daniela Prócida R
Braz Oral Res; 2017 Nov; 31():e88. PubMed ID: 29116299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-year survival of glass ionomer sealants placed as part of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations.
Kemoli AM; Opinya GN; van Amerongen WE
East Afr Med J; 2010 Sep; 87(9):375-81. PubMed ID: 23457815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up.
Deepa G; Shobha T
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 20642467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Hesse D; de Araujo MP; Olegário IC; Innes N; Raggio DP; Bonifácio CC
Trials; 2016 Mar; 17():169. PubMed ID: 27029801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The dilemma of selecting suitable proximal carious lesions in primary molars for restoration using ART technique.
Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE
Community Dent Health; 2011 Mar; 28(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 21485228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-cost GICs reduce survival rate in occlusal ART restorations in primary molars after one year: A RCT.
Olegário IC; Pacheco AL; de Araújo MP; Ladewig NM; Bonifácio CC; Imparato JC; Raggio DP
J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():45-50. PubMed ID: 27956016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of a chlorhexidine containing cavity disinfectant on the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement following ART: 24-month results.
Ersin NK; Aykut A; Candan U; Onçağ O; Eronat C; Kose T
Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18435375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-year evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in primary molars class I and II restorations.
da Franca C; Colares V; Van Amerongen E
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2011 Jul; 21(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21401749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. One-year survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars placed with and without cavity conditioner.
Yassen G
J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19619427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of the ART approach and materials in peri-urban farm schools of the Johannesburg area.
Mickenautsch S; Kopsala J; Rudolph MJ; Ogunbodede EO
SADJ; 2000 Jul; 55(7):364-8. PubMed ID: 12608196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Compressive strength of two newly developed glass-ionomer materials for use with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach in class II cavities.
Koenraads H; Van der Kroon G; Frencken JE
Dent Mater; 2009 Apr; 25(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 19211138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
