These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19732191)

  • 21. Clinical evaluation of three caries removal approaches in primary teeth: a randomised controlled trial.
    Phonghanyudh A; Phantumvanit P; Songpaisan Y; Petersen PE
    Community Dent Health; 2012 Jun; 29(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 22779380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Survival of multiple-surface ART restorations using a zinc-reinforced glass-ionomer restorative after 2 years: A randomized triple-blind clinical trial.
    Mobarak E; El-Deeb H; Daifalla LE; Ghaly M; Mustafa M; Sabry D; Fatah H; Mulder J; Creugers NHJ; Frencken JE
    Dent Mater; 2019 Sep; 35(9):e185-e192. PubMed ID: 31235189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
    Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
    Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: results from a paediatric dental clinic.
    Pinto Gdos S; Oliveira LJ; Romano AR; Schardosim LR; Bonow ML; Pacce M; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Torriani DD
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1248-54. PubMed ID: 25150105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Amalgam and ART restorations in children: a controlled clinical trial.
    de Amorim RG; Leal SC; Mulder J; Creugers NH; Frencken JE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 23455576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Survival rates of two atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) types in occlusal carious permanent teeth after two years.
    Ibiyemi O; Bankole OO; Oke GA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2011 Jun; 40(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 22195380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical evaluation of the ART technique using high density and resin-modified glass lonomer cements.
    de Souza EM; Cefaly DF; Terada RS; Rodrigues CC; de Lima Navarro MF
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2003; 1(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 15641498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical evaluation of atraumatic restorations in primary molars: a comparison between 2 glass ionomer cements.
    Menezes JP; Rosenblatt A; Medeiros E
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16948370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is it worth using low-cost glass ionomer cements for occlusal ART restorations in primary molars? 2-year survival and cost analysis of a Randomized clinical trial.
    Olegário IC; Ladewig NM; Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Imparato JCP; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
    J Dent; 2020 Oct; 101():103446. PubMed ID: 32758684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical effects of glass ionomer restorations on residual carious dentin in primary molars.
    Smales RJ; Ngo HC; Yip KH; Yu C
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 16158811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Is high-viscosity glass-ionomer-cement a successor to amalgam for treating primary molars?
    Hilgert LA; de Amorim RG; Leal SC; Mulder J; Creugers NH; Frencken JE
    Dent Mater; 2014 Oct; 30(10):1172-8. PubMed ID: 25132283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
    Markovic D; Peric T
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT.
    Oliveira RC; Camargo LB; Novaes TF; Pontes LRA; Olegário IC; Gimenez T; Pássaro AL; Tedesco TK; Braga MM; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jul; 21(1):371. PubMed ID: 34301217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement in primary molars.
    Rutar J; McAllan L; Tyas MJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):486-8. PubMed ID: 11132508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of multiple-surface ART restorations: 12 month follow-up.
    Cefaly DF; Barata TJ; Bresciani E; Fagundes TC; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2007; 74(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 18482515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Glass ionomer-silver cermet Class II tunnel-restorations for primary molars.
    Croll TP
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 2968382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the clinical behavior of resin modified glass ionomer cement on primary molars: a comparative one-year study.
    Prabhakar AR; Raju OS; Kurthukoti AJ; Satish V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 18264535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.