These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Influence of economic restraints and reduced specialist resources on delivery and quality of orthodontic care. Josefsson E; Halling A Swed Dent J; 2000; 24(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 11140543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The quality of treatment in the adult orthodontic patient as judged by orthodontists and measured by the Objective Grading System. Chaison ET; Liu X; Tuncay OC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4 Suppl):S69-75. PubMed ID: 21435541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in orthodontic treatment modalities in the past 20 years: exploring the link between technology and scientific evidence. Bradley TG J Ir Dent Assoc; 2013; 59(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 23729055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Introducing orthodontics into the dental lab. Inman D J Dent Technol; 2001; 18(5):8-10. PubMed ID: 11933715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Orthodontic quality; with the Liaison Bureau of the French Society of Orthodontics]. Mauchamp OP Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1978 Oct; 12(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 288147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. How can the specialty establish a standard of care? Vaden JL; Riolo ML Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 19815150 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Orthodontic evolution: an update for the general dental practitioner. Part 1: recent advances, treatment need and demand, and benefits of treatment. McGuinness NJ J Ir Dent Assoc; 2008; 54(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 18578385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A report of the ABO Resident Clinical Outcome Study (the pilot study). Dykhouse VJ; Moffitt AH; Grubb JE; Greco PM; English JD; Briss BS; Jamieson SA; Kastrop MC; Owens SE Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):656-61. PubMed ID: 17110264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Twenty-five percent is not enough. Turpin DL Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jul; 128(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16027610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment postretention outcomes compared using the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Kuncio D; Maganzini A; Shelton C; Freeman K Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):864-9. PubMed ID: 17685783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual application of the American Board of Orthodontics Grading System. Scott SA; Freer TJ Aust Orthod J; 2005 May; 21(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 16433082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meeting the challenge of the orthodontics specialty exam. Anthony T J Dent Technol; 1998 Sep; 15(7):30-5. PubMed ID: 10337280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Lack of evidence forces practitioners to make clinically based decisions. Ellis CP Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):3; author reply 4. PubMed ID: 21195266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Advances in digital technology and orthodontics: a reference to the Invisalign method. Melkos AB Med Sci Monit; 2005 May; 11(5):PI39-42. PubMed ID: 15874904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnets in orthodontics. George TM; Valiathan A; George AI; Payapilly DJ J Pierre Fauchard Acad; 1992 Jun; 6(2):45-54. PubMed ID: 1344282 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]