1096 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19732667)
1. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
Fleming PS; DiBiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of transverse dimensional and incisor changes between wide and narrow orthodontic archwires: a randomized controlled trial.
Ahmed AS; Al-Nimri KS; Ahmed WS
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):338. PubMed ID: 38797781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficiency of mandibular arch alignment with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
Fleming PS; DiBiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):597-602. PubMed ID: 19409342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The timing of significant arch dimensional changes with fixed orthodontic appliances: data from a multicenter randomised controlled trial.
Fleming PS; Lee RT; Mcdonald T; Pandis N; Johal A
J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24269833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of maxillary arch dimensional changes with passive and active self-ligation and conventional brackets in the permanent dentition: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
Fleming PS; Lee RT; Marinho V; Johal A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 23910199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of levelling of the curve of Spee on the proclination of mandibular incisors and expansion of dental arches: a prospective clinical trial.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Sifakakis I; Makou M; Eliades T
Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 20575202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maxillary dental arch changes following the leveling and alignment stage with lingual and labial orthodontic appliances: a preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial.
Khattab TZ; Hajeer MY; Farah H; Al-Sabbagh R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Sep; 15(5):561-6. PubMed ID: 25707826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finishing effectiveness of different archwires using SmartClip™ self-ligating brackets: a clinical study.
Ferrari S; Bellincampi M; Sfondrini MF; Caprioglio A; Gandini P
Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 24456630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial.
Scott P; DiBiase AT; Sherriff M; Cobourne MT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):470.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18929262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the effects of rectangular and round arch wires in leveling the curve of Spee.
AlQabandi AK; Sadowsky C; BeGole EA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Nov; 116(5):522-9. PubMed ID: 10547511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional analysis of the tooth movement and arch dimension changes in Class I malocclusions treated with first premolar extractions: a guideline for virtual treatment planning.
Cho MY; Choi JH; Lee SP; Baek SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 21130334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effectiveness of laceback ligatures: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Irvine R; Power S; McDonald F
J Orthod; 2004 Dec; 31(4):303-11; discussion 300. PubMed ID: 15608345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mandibular dental arch changes with active self-ligating brackets combined with different archwires.
Atik E; Akarsu-Guven B; Kocadereli I
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 May; 21(5):566-572. PubMed ID: 29735855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 17693371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Katsaros C; Eliades T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e99-e105. PubMed ID: 21889063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
Songra G; Clover M; Atack NE; Ewings P; Sherriff M; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of self-ligating brackets, superelastic wires, expansion/proclination, and permanent retention--a word of caution.
Zachrisson BU
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 16779979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of maxillary arch dimensional and inclination changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets using broad archwires.
Atik E; Akarsu-Guven B; Kocadereli I; Ciger S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jun; 149(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 27241993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficiency of self-ligating vs conventionally ligated brackets during initial alignment.
Ong E; McCallum H; Griffin MP; Ho C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):138.e1-7; discussion 138-9. PubMed ID: 20691348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
