1096 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19732667)
21. Maxillary arch changes with transpalatal arch treatment followed by full fixed appliances.
Raucci G; Pachêco-Pereira C; Grassia V; d'Apuzzo F; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):683-9. PubMed ID: 25286341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An assessment of conventional and self-ligating brackets in Class I maxillary constriction patients.
Atik E; Ciğer S
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):615-22. PubMed ID: 24423203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.
Fourie Z; Ozcan M; Sandham A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Extrusion-based leveling with segmented arch mechanics.
Noroozi H; Moeinzad H
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 11934055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The use of the lingual arch in the mixed dentition to resolve incisor crowding.
Brennan MM; Gianelly AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 10629524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mandibular arch changes following nonextraction treatment.
Waring DT; Pender N; Counihan D
Aust Orthod J; 2005 Nov; 21(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 16429866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of mandibular incisor extraction on anterior occlusion in adults with Class III malocclusion and reduced overbite.
Faerovig E; Zachrisson BU
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Feb; 115(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 9971920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of transverse maxillary dental arch width changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets in patients requiring premolar extraction - A randomised clinical trial.
Bashir R; Sonar S; Batra P; Srivastava A; Singla A
Int Orthod; 2019 Dec; 17(4):687-692. PubMed ID: 31466930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Perioral forces and dental changes resulting from mandibular lip bumper treatment.
O'Donnell S; Nanda RS; Ghosh J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Mar; 113(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 9517714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Treatment time, outcome, and anchorage loss comparisons of self-ligating and conventional brackets.
Machibya FM; Bao X; Zhao L; Hu M
Angle Orthod; 2013 Mar; 83(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 22900592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances.
Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Shetty VS; Mogra S
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 21436189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Arch-dimensional changes in non-extraction cases with finishing wires of a particular material, size and arch form.
Allan D; Woods MG
Aust Orthod J; 2015 May; 31(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 26219144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 23561412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Archwire diameter effect on tooth alignment with different bracket-archwire combinations.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26718381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical evaluation of dental alignment and leveling with three different types of orthodontic wires.
Gravina MA; Brunharo IH; Fraga MR; Artese F; Campos MJ; Vitral RW; Quintão CC
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):31-7. PubMed ID: 24351147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Porcelain brackets during initial alignment: are self-ligating cosmetic brackets more efficient?
Miles P; Weyant R
Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 20575195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with different malocclusions.
Singh DP; Garg AK; Singh SP; Krishna Nayak US; Gupta M
Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 25511063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Predictors of long-term stability of maxillary dental arch dimensions in patients treated with a transpalatal arch followed by fixed appliances.
Raucci G; Elyasi M; Pachêco-Pereira C; Grassia V; d'Apuzzo F; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():24. PubMed ID: 26215180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
