These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1071 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19733758)

  • 1. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter-trial inhibition of attention to features is modulated by task relevance.
    Levinthal BR; Lleras A
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):12.1-15. PubMed ID: 19146296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Valenza N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):788-99. PubMed ID: 15904545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task.
    Kristjánsson A
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2554-70. PubMed ID: 16527323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finding the target in search tasks using detection, localization, and identification responses.
    Dukewich KR; Klein RM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 19271810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing.
    Andersen SK; Fuchs S; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19702461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
    VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impulsive responding and the sustained attention to response task.
    Helton WS
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18608658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target.
    Nagy AL; Neriani KE; Young TL
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1885-99. PubMed ID: 15797778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Location and color biases have different influences on selective attention.
    Fecteau JH; Korjoukov I; Roelfsema PR
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(9):996-1005. PubMed ID: 19324066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning by selection: visual search and object perception in young infants.
    Amso D; Johnson SP
    Dev Psychol; 2006 Nov; 42(6):1236-45. PubMed ID: 17087555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Object representations maintain attentional control settings across space and time.
    Schreij D; Olivers CN
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 19682674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
    Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fear-object perception: does it entail the involuntary capture of attention?
    Sebastiani L; Castellani E; Dalessandro L
    Arch Ital Biol; 2010 Mar; 148(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 20426252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 54.