2518 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19733758)
1. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inter-trial inhibition of attention to features is modulated by task relevance.
Levinthal BR; Lleras A
J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):12.1-15. PubMed ID: 19146296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
Fujisaki W; Nishida S
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.
Ptak R; Valenza N
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):788-99. PubMed ID: 15904545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task.
Kristjánsson A
Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2554-70. PubMed ID: 16527323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finding the target in search tasks using detection, localization, and identification responses.
Dukewich KR; Klein RM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 19271810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing.
Andersen SK; Fuchs S; Müller MM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19702461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impulsive responding and the sustained attention to response task.
Helton WS
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18608658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
Snow JC; Mattingley JB
Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target.
Nagy AL; Neriani KE; Young TL
Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1885-99. PubMed ID: 15797778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Location and color biases have different influences on selective attention.
Fecteau JH; Korjoukov I; Roelfsema PR
Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(9):996-1005. PubMed ID: 19324066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Learning by selection: visual search and object perception in young infants.
Amso D; Johnson SP
Dev Psychol; 2006 Nov; 42(6):1236-45. PubMed ID: 17087555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Object representations maintain attentional control settings across space and time.
Schreij D; Olivers CN
Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 19682674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fear-object perception: does it entail the involuntary capture of attention?
Sebastiani L; Castellani E; Dalessandro L
Arch Ital Biol; 2010 Mar; 148(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 20426252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
