218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19733793)
21. Health care inflation and high-tech medicine: a new look.
Pentecost MJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):901-3. PubMed ID: 17411729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnosis please...if you want to get paid!
Duszak R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 May; 2(5):447-8. PubMed ID: 17411853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Point: Should tele-ICU services be eligible for professional fee billing? Yes. Tele-ICUs and the triple aim.
McCambridge MM; Tracy JA; Sample GA
Chest; 2011 Oct; 140(4):847-849. PubMed ID: 21972379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Increase in health care costs due to technological diffusion in diagnostic tests and diagnostic imaging.
Ikegami N; Ikeda S
Jpn Hosp; 1996 Jul; 15():15-23. PubMed ID: 10172756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Obamacare and fee-for-service.
Silva E
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Jul; 11(7):656. PubMed ID: 24889472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The transformation of diagnostic radiology in the ACO era.
Seltzer SE; Lee TH
JAMA; 2014 Jul; 312(3):227-8. PubMed ID: 25027135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Trends in the utilization of medical procedures that use ionizing radiation.
Bhargavan M
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):612-27. PubMed ID: 18849695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cancer's next frontier: addressing high and increasing costs.
Elkin EB; Bach PB
JAMA; 2010 Mar; 303(11):1086-7. PubMed ID: 20233828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Counterpoint: Should tele-ICU services be eligible for professional fee billing? No.
Hoffmann S
Chest; 2011 Oct; 140(4):849-851. PubMed ID: 21972380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Imaging services and increasing health care costs: is limiting self-referral the answer to controlling costs?
Greeson TW; Zimmerman HM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):A9-11. PubMed ID: 15599973
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Traditional fee-for-service Medicare payment systems and fragmented patient care: the backdrop for non-operating room procedures and anesthesia services.
Kane NM
Anesthesiol Clin; 2009 Mar; 27(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 19361763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Diagnostic radiology--development and aspects].
Gerhardt P
Rontgenpraxis; 1990 Feb; 43(2):33-41. PubMed ID: 2406952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Evidence-informed case rates: paying for safer, more reliable care.
De Brantes F; Rastogi A
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2008 Jun; 40():1-13. PubMed ID: 18604912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Imaging self-referral: here we go again.
Lungren MP; Paxton BE; Kilani RK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):W658. PubMed ID: 24059408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Imaging self-referral: here we go again. Reply.
Hutchinson M; Rowe ES
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):W659. PubMed ID: 24059409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Japanese revision of fee for medical services in 2010].
Yoneyama A
Rinsho Byori; 2010 Jul; 58(7):725-32. PubMed ID: 20936780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Yet another flawed study of self-referral?
Hutchinson M; Rowe E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Sep; 199(3):W414. PubMed ID: 22915436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Medicare part C: a basic primer and some practical advice about Medicare private fee-for-service plans.
Hofstra P; Zupko K
J Med Pract Manage; 2009; 24(5):297-9. PubMed ID: 19455868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Trends in diagnostic CT among fee-for-service enrollees, 2000-2011.
Hamra GB; Semelka RC; Burke LM; Pate V; Brookhart MA
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Feb; 11(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 24035504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Health reform and imaging.
Thrall JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jan; 6(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 19111260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
