231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19733804)
1. Clinical indication and patient age predict likelihood of malignancy in suspicious breast MRI lesions.
Gutierrez RL; Demartini WB; Eby P; Kurland BF; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1281-5. PubMed ID: 19733804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Suspicious breast lesions detected at 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging: clinical and histological outcomes.
Johnson KS; Baker JA; Lee SS; Soo MS
Acad Radiol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):667-74. PubMed ID: 22459645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size.
Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Bazzocchi M
Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement.
Gutierrez RL; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Kurland BF; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):994-1000. PubMed ID: 19770321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Small masses on breast MR: is biopsy necessary?
Raza S; Sekar M; Ong EM; Birdwell RL
Acad Radiol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):412-9. PubMed ID: 22277636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on surgical decision making and cancer recurrence rates.
Pediconi F; Miglio E; Telesca M; Luciani ML; Kirchin MA; Passariello R; Catalano C
Invest Radiol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 21934515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in early breast cancer: implications for partial breast irradiation.
Tendulkar RD; Chellman-Jeffers M; Rybicki LA; Rim A; Kotwal A; Macklis R; Obi BB
Cancer; 2009 Apr; 115(8):1621-30. PubMed ID: 19224552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in screening women at high risk of breast cancer.
Warner E
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 19(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 18941396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of occult foci of breast cancer using breast-specific gamma imaging in women with one mammographic or clinically suspicious breast lesion.
Brem RF; Shahan C; Rapleyea JA; Donnelly CA; Rechtman LR; Kidwell AB; Teal CB; McSwain A; Torrente J
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):735-43. PubMed ID: 20457416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rate of malignancy in MRI-detected probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions.
Spick C; Szolar DH; Baltzer PA; Tillich M; Reittner P; Preidler KW; Pinker-Domenig K; Helbich TH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 24555608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Productivity of needle localization to facilitate excision of nonpalpable, mammographically suspicious lesions.
Higgins G; Abdulkareen A; Loutfi A; Gagnon JH; Shibata HR
Can J Surg; 1991 Jun; 34(3):287-9. PubMed ID: 2054762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Diagnostic value of a breast MRI score for the prediction of malignancy of breast lesions detected solely with MRI].
Siegmann KC; Moron HU; Baur A; Hahn M; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Bitzer M
Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 19452398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening for breast cancer with MRI: recent experience from the Australian Capital Territory.
Price J; Chen SW
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Feb; 53(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 19453531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast magnetic resonance imaging characteristics in women with occult primary breast carcinoma.
Lieberman S; Sella T; Maly B; Sosna J; Uziely B; Sklair-Levy M
Isr Med Assoc J; 2008 Jun; 10(6):448-52. PubMed ID: 18669145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The utility of breast MRI as a problem-solving tool.
Yau EJ; Gutierrez RL; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2011; 17(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 21477168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of breast cancer associated with papilloma.
Sakr R; Rouzier R; Salem C; Antoine M; Chopier J; Daraï E; Uzan S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1304-8. PubMed ID: 18440190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MRI and mammography surveillance of women at increased risk for breast cancer: recommendations using an evidence-based approach.
Granader EJ; Dwamena B; Carlos RC
Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1590-5. PubMed ID: 19000876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. JOURNAL CLUB: Is screening MRI indicated for women with a personal history of breast cancer? Analysis based on biopsy results.
Arazi-Kleinman T; Skair-Levy M; Slonimsky E; Maly B; Uziely B; Libson E; Sella T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):919-27. PubMed ID: 24059385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Carotid vulnerable lesions are related to accelerated recurrence for cerebral infarction magnetic resonance imaging study.
Lin K; Zhang ZQ; Detrano R; Lu B; Fan ZM
Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1180-6. PubMed ID: 16979066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
