These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19733840)

  • 1. Comparing perception of Stroop stimuli in focused versus divided attention paradigms: evidence for dramatic processing differences.
    Eidels A; Townsend JT; Algom D
    Cognition; 2010 Feb; 114(2):129-50. PubMed ID: 19733840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transitions between color categories mapped with a reverse Stroop task.
    Smithson HE; Khan SS; Sharpe LT; Stockman A
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):453-60. PubMed ID: 16961980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reaction time to word meaning and ink color of laterally-presented stroop stimuli: effects of handedness and sex.
    Simon JR; Paullin C; Overmyer SP; Berbaum K
    Int J Neurosci; 1985 Oct; 28(1-2):21-33. PubMed ID: 4066188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Color-Word Stroop test performance across the adult life span.
    Uttl B; Graf P
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1997 Jun; 19(3):405-20. PubMed ID: 9268815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tracking eye movements to localize Stroop interference in naming: word planning versus articulatory buffering.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1332-47. PubMed ID: 24749961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The color-word Stroop effect driven by working memory maintenance.
    Pan Y; Han Y; Zuo W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2722-2731. PubMed ID: 31214969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two distinct patterns of interference in between-attribute Stroop matching tasks.
    Dittrich K; Stahl C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):563-581. PubMed ID: 27981523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stroop matching task: role of feature selection and temporal modulation.
    David IA; Volchan E; Vila J; Keil A; de Oliveira L; Faria-Júnior AJ; Perakakis P; Dias EC; Mocaiber I; Pereira MG; Machado-Pinheiro W
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 208(4):595-605. PubMed ID: 21161193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.
    Kinoshita S; Mills L; Norris D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1730-1742. PubMed ID: 29672118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stroop effects on redemption and semantic effects on confession: simultaneous automatic activation of embedded and carrier words.
    Iani C; Job R; Padovani R; Nicoletti R
    Cogn Process; 2009 Nov; 10(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 19301049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention enhances the neural processing of relevant features and suppresses the processing of irrelevant features in humans: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of the Stroop task.
    Polk TA; Drake RM; Jonides JJ; Smith MR; Smith EE
    J Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 28(51):13786-92. PubMed ID: 19091969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A reach-to-touch investigation on the nature of reading in the Stroop task.
    Tillman G; Eidels A; Finkbeiner M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2547-2557. PubMed ID: 27549606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Animacy and attentional processes: Evidence from the Stroop task.
    Bugaiska A; Grégoire L; Camblats AM; Gelin M; Méot A; Bonin P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):882-889. PubMed ID: 29716460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Joint Influence of Visual and Auditory Words in the Stroop Task.
    Francis WS; MacLeod CM; Taylor RS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):200-211. PubMed ID: 27743263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Color perception deficits in co-existing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and chronic tic disorders.
    Roessner V; Banaschewski T; Fillmer-Otte A; Becker A; Albrecht B; Uebel H; Sergeant J; Tannock R; Rothenberger A
    J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2008; 115(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 17896072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of multiple sclerosis on patients' performance on the Stroop Test: processing speed versus interference.
    Denney DR; Lynch SG
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 May; 15(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 19402931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emotional Stroop Dilution: The boundary conditions of attentional capture by threat words.
    Reynolds MG; Langerak RM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():108-15. PubMed ID: 26093219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential effect of HIV infection and alcoholism on conflict processing, attentional allocation, and perceptual load: evidence from a Stroop Match-to-Sample task.
    Schulte T; Mueller-Oehring EM; Rosenbloom MJ; Pfefferbaum A; Sullivan EV
    Biol Psychiatry; 2005 Jan; 57(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 15607302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing Stroop-like and Simon Effects on Perceptual Features.
    Scerrati E; Lugli L; Nicoletti R; Umiltà C
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17815. PubMed ID: 29259275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Depth of processing in the stroop task: evidence from a novel forced-reading condition.
    Eidels A; Ryan K; Williams P; Algom D
    Exp Psychol; 2014; 61(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 24836124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.