BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1691 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19734788)

  • 1. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
    Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Lam C; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linguistic, perceptual, and cognitive factors underlying musicians' benefits in noise-degraded speech perception.
    Yoo J; Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():189-195. PubMed ID: 30978607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Musical Training and Working Memory in Adverse Listening Situations.
    Escobar J; Mussoi BS; Silberer AB
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):278-288. PubMed ID: 32106117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Musical Experience Offsets Age-Related Decline in Understanding Speech-in-Noise: Type of Training Does Not Matter, Working Memory Is the Key.
    Zhang L; Fu X; Luo D; Xing L; Du Y
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):258-270. PubMed ID: 32826504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.
    Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.
    Yucel E; Sennaroglu G; Belgin E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 73(7):1043-52. PubMed ID: 19411117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural discrimination of nonprototypical chords in music experts and laymen: an MEG study.
    Brattico E; Pallesen KJ; Varyagina O; Bailey C; Anourova I; Järvenpää M; Eerola T; Tervaniemi M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2230-44. PubMed ID: 18855547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No Musician Advantage in the Perception of Degraded-Fundamental Frequency Speech in Noisy Environments.
    Hsieh IH; Guo YJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Aug; 66(8):2643-2655. PubMed ID: 37499233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Musical experience shapes top-down auditory mechanisms: evidence from masking and auditory attention performance.
    Strait DL; Kraus N; Parbery-Clark A; Ashley R
    Hear Res; 2010 Mar; 261(1-2):22-9. PubMed ID: 20018234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Musical training influences linguistic abilities in 8-year-old children: more evidence for brain plasticity.
    Moreno S; Marques C; Santos A; Santos M; Castro SL; Besson M
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Mar; 19(3):712-23. PubMed ID: 18832336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Musicians detect pitch violation in a foreign language better than nonmusicians: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Marques C; Moreno S; Castro SL; Besson M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 19(9):1453-63. PubMed ID: 17714007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle RA; Smith SL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 17675590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 85.