BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19735101)

  • 1. Evaluation of pelvic lymph node coverage of conventional radiotherapy fields based on bony landmarks in Chinese cervical cancer patients using CT simulation.
    Zhang X; Yu H
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2009 Sep; 10(9):683-8. PubMed ID: 19735101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of CT simulation for treatment of cervical cancer to assess the adequacy of lymph node coverage of conventional pelvic fields based on bony landmarks.
    Finlay MH; Ackerman I; Tirona RG; Hamilton P; Barbera L; Thomas G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):205-9. PubMed ID: 16198505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bony landmarks are not an adequate substitute for lymphangiography in defining pelvic lymph node location for the treatment of cervical cancer with radiotherapy.
    Bonin SR; Lanciano RM; Corn BW; Hogan WM; Hartz WH; Hanks GE
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Jan; 34(1):167-72. PubMed ID: 12118547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT Simulation to Evaluate of Pelvic Lymph Node Coverage in Conventional Radiotherapy Fields Based on Bone and Vessels Landmarks in Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Yousefi Kashi AS; Khaledi S; Houshyari M
    Iran J Cancer Prev; 2016 Jun; 9(3):e6233. PubMed ID: 27703649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of CT simulation for treatment of cervical cancer to assess the adequacy of lymph node coverage of conventional pelvic fields based on bony landmarks: In regard to Finlay et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;64:205-209).
    Yazici G; Yildiz F; Cengiz M; Ozyigit G; Selek U; Genç M; Atahan IL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Aug; 65(5):1594; author reply 1594. PubMed ID: 16863938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation fields in gynecologic oncology: correlation of soft tissue (surgical) to radiologic landmarks.
    McAlpine J; Schlaerth JB; Lim P; Chen D; Eisenkop SM; Spirtos NM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jan; 92(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 14751134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interindividual variability of lymph drainages in patients with cervical cancer. Implication on irradiation planning.
    Marnitz S; Köhler C; Schneider A; Seiler F; Hinkelbein W
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2006 Feb; 182(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 16447014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomic study of the pelvis in carcinoma of the uterine cervix as related to the box technique.
    Zunino S; Rosato O; Lucino S; Jauregui E; Rossi L; Venencia D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Apr; 44(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 10219794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The benefit of small bowel and pelvic bone sparing in excluding common iliac lymph node region from conventional radiation fields in patients with uterine cervical cancer: a dosimetric study.
    Oike T; Ohno T; Wakatsuki M; Noda SE; Saitoh J; Mizukami T; Yoshimoto Y; Okonogi N; Katoh H; Shibuya K; Suzuki Y; Ishikawa H; Ebara T; Takahashi T; Nakano T
    J Radiat Res; 2010; 51(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 20972366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pelvic nodal CTV from L4-L5 or aortic bifurcation? An audit of the patterns of regional failures in cervical cancer patients treated with pelvic radiotherapy.
    Rai B; Bansal A; Patel F; Gulia A; Kapoor R; Sharma SC
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2014 Oct; 44(10):941-7. PubMed ID: 25104792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of margins in pelvic lymph nodes and prostate radiotherapy and the impact of bladder and rectum on prostate position.
    Marnouche EA; Hadadi K; Abdelhak M; Benlemlih M; Hommadi M; Zaghba N; Andaloussi Saghir K; Elmarjany M; Sifat H; Mansouri H
    Cancer Radiother; 2021 Apr; 25(2):161-168. PubMed ID: 33454191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance imaging in the treatment planning of radiation therapy in carcinoma of the cervix treated with the four-field pelvic technique.
    Thomas L; Chacon B; Kind M; Lasbareilles O; Muyldermans P; Chemin A; Le Treut A; Pigneux J; Kantor G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(4):827-32. PubMed ID: 9128958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional four-field pelvic radiotherapy technique without computed tomography-treatment planning in cancer of the cervix: potential geographic miss and its impact on pelvic control.
    Kim RY; McGinnis LS; Spencer SA; Meredith RF; Jennelle RL; Salter MM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Jan; 31(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 7995740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patterns of Lymph Node Failure after Dose-escalated Radiotherapy: Implications for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Coverage.
    Spratt DE; Vargas HA; Zumsteg ZS; Golia Pernicka JS; Osborne JR; Pei X; Zelefsky MJ
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jan; 71(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 27523595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hybrid imaging by SPECT/CT for sentinel lymph node detection in patients with cancer of the uterine cervix.
    Martínez A; Zerdoud S; Mery E; Bouissou E; Ferron G; Querleu D
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Dec; 119(3):431-5. PubMed ID: 20822803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective clinical trial of positron emission tomography/computed tomography image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy for cervical carcinoma with positive para-aortic lymph nodes.
    Esthappan J; Chaudhari S; Santanam L; Mutic S; Olsen J; Macdonald DM; Low DA; Singh AK; Grigsby PW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Nov; 72(4):1134-9. PubMed ID: 18472358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Standard versus individually planned irradiation field in radiotherapy of infradiaphragmatic lymph node sites].
    Nevinny-Stickel M; Ennemoser S; Bangerl I; zur Nedden D; Lukas P
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1998 Jul; 174(7):341-4. PubMed ID: 9689953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single photon emission computed tomography SPECT-CT improves sentinel node detection and localization in cervical and uterine malignancy.
    Pandit-Taskar N; Gemignani ML; Lyall A; Larson SM; Barakat RR; Abu Rustum NR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Apr; 117(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 20117827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic value of cervical size and pelvic lymph node status assessed by computed tomography for patients with uterine cervical cancer treated by radical radiation therapy.
    Toita T; Nakano M; Higashi M; Sakumoto K; Kanazawa K
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Nov; 33(4):843-9. PubMed ID: 7591892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pelvic lymph node F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake as a prognostic biomarker in newly diagnosed patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Kidd EA; Siegel BA; Dehdashti F; Grigsby PW
    Cancer; 2010 Mar; 116(6):1469-75. PubMed ID: 20108309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.