BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

595 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19735222)

  • 1. The CASTLE study: atazanavir/r versus lopinavir/r in antiretroviral-naive patients.
    Chetchotisakd P
    Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther; 2009 Sep; 7(7):801-5. PubMed ID: 19735222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 96-week CASTLE data show similar efficacy results.
    AIDS Patient Care STDS; 2008 Nov; 22(11):918. PubMed ID: 19043840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir compared with twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study.
    Molina JM; Andrade-Villanueva J; Echevarria J; Chetchotisakd P; Corral J; David N; Moyle G; Mancini M; Percival L; Yang R; Wirtz V; Lataillade M; Absalon J; McGrath D;
    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2010 Mar; 53(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 20032785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment of advanced HIV disease in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-1-infected patients receiving once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir or twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine.
    Uy J; Yang R; Wirtz V; Sheppard L; Farajallah A; McGrath D
    AIDS Care; 2011 Nov; 23(11):1500-4. PubMed ID: 21732894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy and safety of replacing lopinavir with atazanavir in HIV-infected patients with undetectable plasma viraemia: final results of the SLOAT trial.
    Soriano V; García-Gasco P; Vispo E; Ruiz-Sancho A; Blanco F; Martín-Carbonero L; Rodríguez-Novoa S; Morello J; de Mendoza C; Rivas P; Barreiro P; González-Lahoz J
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2008 Jan; 61(1):200-5. PubMed ID: 17999977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lipid profiles for nevirapine vs. atazanavir/ritonavir, both combined with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine over 48 weeks, in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected patients (the ARTEN study).
    Podzamczer D; Andrade-Villanueva J; Clotet B; Taylor S; Rockstroh JK; Reiss P; Domingo P; Gellermann HJ; de Rossi L; Cairns V; Soriano V
    HIV Med; 2011 Jul; 12(6):374-82. PubMed ID: 21518220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nevirapine versus atazanavir/ritonavir, each combined with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine, in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 patients: the ARTEN Trial.
    Soriano V; Arastéh K; Migrone H; Lutz T; Opravil M; Andrade-Villanueva J; Antunes F; Di Perri G; Podzamczer D; Taylor S; Domingo P; Gellermann H; de Rossi L;
    Antivir Ther; 2011; 16(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 21555816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Efficacy of atazanavir in treatment-naive patients].
    Moreno S; Hernández B; Dronda F
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2008 Dec; 26 Suppl 17():9-13. PubMed ID: 20116611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 48 week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study.
    Molina JM; Andrade-Villanueva J; Echevarria J; Chetchotisakd P; Corral J; David N; Moyle G; Mancini M; Percival L; Yang R; Thiry A; McGrath D;
    Lancet; 2008 Aug; 372(9639):646-55. PubMed ID: 18722869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Salvage therapy with atazanavir/ritonavir combined to tenofovir in HIV-infected patients with multiple treatment failures: randomized ANRS 107 trial.
    Piketty C; Gérard L; Chazallon C; Marcelin AG; Clavel F; Taburet AM; Calvez V; Madelaine-Chambrin I; Molina JM; Aboulker JP; Girard PM;
    Antivir Ther; 2006; 11(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 16640102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Atazanavir: new indication. First-line treatment: fewer gastrointestinal disorders but more cases of jaundice and a risk of torsades de pointes.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):104. PubMed ID: 19637415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gastrointestinal tolerability and quality of life in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: data from the CASTLE study.
    Malan N; Su J; Mancini M; Yang R; Wirtz V; Absalon J; McGrath D;
    AIDS Care; 2010 Jun; 22(6):677-86. PubMed ID: 20467943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 96-week comparison of once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir and twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with multiple virologic failures.
    Johnson M; Grinsztejn B; Rodriguez C; Coco J; DeJesus E; Lazzarin A; Lichtenstein K; Wirtz V; Rightmire A; Odeshoo L; McLaren C
    AIDS; 2006 Mar; 20(5):711-8. PubMed ID: 16514301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cobicistat versus ritonavir as a pharmacoenhancer of atazanavir plus emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in treatment-naive HIV type 1-infected patients: week 48 results.
    Gallant JE; Koenig E; Andrade-Villanueva J; Chetchotisakd P; DeJesus E; Antunes F; Arastéh K; Moyle G; Rizzardini G; Fehr J; Liu Y; Zhong L; Callebaut C; Szwarcberg J; Rhee MS; Cheng AK
    J Infect Dis; 2013 Jul; 208(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 23532097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phase 2 study of cobicistat versus ritonavir each with once-daily atazanavir and fixed-dose emtricitabine/tenofovir df in the initial treatment of HIV infection.
    Elion R; Cohen C; Gathe J; Shalit P; Hawkins T; Liu HC; Mathias AA; Chuck SL; Kearney BP; Warren DR;
    AIDS; 2011 Sep; 25(15):1881-6. PubMed ID: 21811136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short communication: Comparable safety and efficacy with once-daily versus twice-daily dosing of lopinavir/ritonavir tablets with emtricitabine + tenofovir DF in antiretroviral-naïve, HIV type 1-infected subjects: 96 week final results of the randomized trial M05-730.
    González-García J; Cohen D; Johnson M; Sloan L; Fredrick L; Naylor C; da Silva B; Bernstein B;
    AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses; 2010 Aug; 26(8):841-5. PubMed ID: 20672994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy and tolerability of a fosamprenavir-ritonavir-based versus a lopinavir-ritonavir-based antiretroviral treatment in 82 therapy-naïve patients with HIV-1 infection.
    Calza L; Manfredi R; Pocaterra D; Chiodo F
    Int J STD AIDS; 2008 Aug; 19(8):541-4. PubMed ID: 18663041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [New treatment options for HIV-infected patients].
    Wehr A
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 May; 129(19):1093. PubMed ID: 15174468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Medication change due to side effects or possible long-term complications. Side effect management with vision].
    Sankawa Y
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2009 Apr; 151(18):35. PubMed ID: 19769072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost effectiveness of atazanavir-ritonavir versus lopinavir-ritonavir in treatment-naïve human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in the United States.
    Broder MS; Chang EY; Bentley TG; Juday T; Uy J
    J Med Econ; 2011; 14(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 21288058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.