135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19735884)
1. Physiologic reactions after proton beam therapy in patients with prostate cancer: significance of urinary autoactivation.
Shimizu M; Sasaki R; Miyawaki D; Nishimura H; Demizu Y; Akagi T; Suga D; Sakamoto H; Murakami M; Sugimura K; Hishikawa Y
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Oct; 75(2):580-6. PubMed ID: 19735884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo verification of proton beam path by using post-treatment PET/CT imaging.
Hsi WC; Indelicato DJ; Vargas C; Duvvuri S; Li Z; Palta J
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):4136-46. PubMed ID: 19810487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of anatomic motion on proton therapy dose distributions in prostate cancer treatment.
Zhang X; Dong L; Lee AK; Cox JD; Kuban DA; Zhu RX; Wang X; Li Y; Newhauser WD; Gillin M; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Feb; 67(2):620-9. PubMed ID: 17236979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose-volume differences for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging segmentation and planning for proton prostate cancer therapy.
Yeung AR; Vargas CE; Falchook A; Louis D; Olivier K; Keole S; Yeung D; Mendenhall NP; Li Z
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Dec; 72(5):1426-33. PubMed ID: 18762391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric uncertainty in prostate cancer proton radiotherapy.
Lin L; Vargas C; Hsi W; Indelicato D; Slopsema R; Li Z; Yeung D; Horne D; Palta J
Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 35(11):4800-7. PubMed ID: 19070212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative treatment planning on localized prostate carcinoma conformal photon- versus proton-based radiotherapy.
Mock U; Bogner J; Georg D; Auberger T; Pötter R
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Jul; 181(7):448-55. PubMed ID: 15995838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric changes resulting from patient rotational setup errors in proton therapy prostate plans.
Sejpal SV; Amos RA; Bluett JB; Levy LB; Kudchadker RJ; Johnson J; Choi S; Lee AK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Sep; 75(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 19058919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anatomic variations due to radical prostatectomy. Impact on target volume definition and dose-volume parameters of rectum and bladder.
Sanguineti G; Castellone P; Foppiano F; Franzone P; Marcenaro M; Tognoni P; Bolognesi A; Ceresoli GL; Fiorino C
Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Sep; 180(9):563-72. PubMed ID: 15378187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proton therapy coverage for prostate cancer treatment.
Vargas C; Wagner M; Mahajan C; Indelicato D; Fryer A; Falchook A; Horne D; Chellini A; McKenzie C; Lawlor P; Li Z; Lin L; Keole S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Apr; 70(5):1492-501. PubMed ID: 18374228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose distribution in 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: comparison of two treatment techniques (six coplanar fields and two dynamic arcs).
Jereczek-Fossa BA; Cattani F; D'Onofrio A; Cambria R; Kowalczyk A; Corallo A; Vavassori A; Zerini D; Ivaldi GB; DeCobelli O; Orecchia R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Dec; 81(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 17113670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric effects of the prone and supine positions on image guided localized prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Liu B; Lerma FA; Patel S; Amin P; Feng Y; Yi BY; Yu C
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 18207595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spot scanning proton beam therapy for prostate cancer: treatment planning technique and analysis of consequences of rotational and translational alignment errors.
Meyer J; Bluett J; Amos R; Levy L; Choi S; Nguyen QN; Zhu XR; Gillin M; Lee A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Oct; 78(2):428-34. PubMed ID: 20100641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Study of robustness of IMPT and IMRT for prostate cancer against organ movement.
Soukup M; Söhn M; Yan D; Liang J; Alber M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(3):941-9. PubMed ID: 19801105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic analysis of biological and physical limitations of proton beam range verification with offline PET/CT scans.
Knopf A; Parodi K; Bortfeld T; Shih HA; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(14):4477-95. PubMed ID: 19556685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Dose delivered to the patient by megavoltage cone beam computed tomography imaging].
Isambert A; Ferreira IH; Bossi A; Beaudré A; Nicula LE; Lefkopoulos D
Cancer Radiother; 2009 Sep; 13(5):358-64. PubMed ID: 19640758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiotherapy treatment plans with RapidArc for prostate cancer involving seminal vesicles and lymph nodes.
Yoo S; Wu QJ; Lee WR; Yin FF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Mar; 76(3):935-42. PubMed ID: 20044214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A dosimetric analysis comparing treatment of low-risk prostate cancer with TomoTherapy versus static field intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Shah AP; Chen SS; Strauss JB; Kirk MC; Coleman JL; Coon AB; Miller C; Dickler A
Am J Clin Oncol; 2009 Oct; 32(5):460-6. PubMed ID: 19564784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose-volume delivery guided proton therapy using beam on-line PET system.
Nishio T; Ogino T; Nomura K; Uchida H
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4190-7. PubMed ID: 17153398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proton radiotherapy for pediatric bladder/prostate rhabdomyosarcoma: clinical outcomes and dosimetry compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Cotter SE; Herrup DA; Friedmann A; Macdonald SM; Pieretti RV; Robinson G; Adams J; Tarbell NJ; Yock TI
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Dec; 81(5):1367-73. PubMed ID: 20934266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between in-beam and offline positron emission tomography imaging of proton and carbon ion therapeutic irradiation at synchrotron- and cyclotron-based facilities.
Parodi K; Bortfeld T; Haberer T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jul; 71(3):945-56. PubMed ID: 18514787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
