229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19736003)
1. The development and application of multi-criteria decision-making tool with consideration of uncertainty: the selection of a management strategy for the bio-degradable fraction in the municipal solid waste.
El Hanandeh A; El-Zein A
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jan; 101(2):555-61. PubMed ID: 19736003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multi-criteria ranking of different technologies for the anaerobic digestion for energy recovery of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes.
Karagiannidis A; Perkoulidis G
Bioresour Technol; 2009 Apr; 100(8):2355-60. PubMed ID: 19119004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Life-cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management alternatives with consideration of uncertainty: SIWMS development and application.
Hanandeh AE; El-Zein A
Waste Manag; 2010 May; 30(5):902-11. PubMed ID: 20116992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integrated assessment of a new Waste-to-Energy facility in Central Greece in the context of regional perspectives.
Perkoulidis G; Papageorgiou A; Karagiannidis A; Kalogirou S
Waste Manag; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1395-406. PubMed ID: 20061131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Choosing a sustainable demolition waste management strategy using multicriteria decision analysis.
Roussat N; Dujet C; Méhu J
Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 18572397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model.
Aghajani Mir M; Taherei Ghazvinei P; Sulaiman NM; Basri NE; Saheri S; Mahmood NZ; Jahan A; Begum RA; Aghamohammadi N
J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():109-15. PubMed ID: 26496840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey.
Banar M; Cokaygil Z; Ozkan A
Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 18280731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A distance-based uncertainty analysis approach to multi-criteria decision analysis for water resource decision making.
Hyde KM; Maier HR; Colby CB
J Environ Manage; 2005 Dec; 77(4):278-90. PubMed ID: 16288957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP.
De Feo G; De Gisi S
Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2370-82. PubMed ID: 20444589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An analytic network process model for municipal solid waste disposal options.
Khan S; Faisal MN
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1500-8. PubMed ID: 17851062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Policy planning under uncertainty: efficient starting populations for simulation-optimization methods applied to municipal solid waste management.
Huang GH; Linton JD; Yeomans JS; Yoogalingam R
J Environ Manage; 2005 Oct; 77(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 15949891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of multi-criteria decision-making on strategic municipal solid waste management in Dalmatia, Croatia.
Vego G; Kucar-Dragicević S; Koprivanac N
Waste Manag; 2008 Nov; 28(11):2192-201. PubMed ID: 18032019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An inexact multi-objective dynamic model and its application in China for the management of municipal solid waste.
Su J; Xi BD; Liu HL; Jiang YH; Warith MA
Waste Manag; 2008 Dec; 28(12):2532-41. PubMed ID: 18572399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fuzzy multicriteria disposal method and site selection for municipal solid waste.
Ekmekçioğlu M; Kaya T; Kahraman C
Waste Manag; 2010; 30(8-9):1729-36. PubMed ID: 20303733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel sustainable decision making model for municipal solid waste management.
Hung ML; Ma HW; Yang WF
Waste Manag; 2007; 27(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 16529920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. LCA of integrated MSW management systems: case study of the Bologna District.
Buttol P; Masoni P; Bonoli A; Goldoni S; Belladonna V; Cavazzuti C
Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):1059-70. PubMed ID: 17418562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England.
Papageorgiou A; Barton JR; Karagiannidis A
J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 19482412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
Onüt S; Soner S
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of landfilling and composting on greenhouse gas emissions--a review.
Lou XF; Nair J
Bioresour Technol; 2009 Aug; 100(16):3792-8. PubMed ID: 19155172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multi-criteria decision aid approach for the selection of the best compromise management scheme for ELVs: the case of Cyprus.
Mergias I; Moustakas K; Papadopoulos A; Loizidou M
J Hazard Mater; 2007 Aug; 147(3):706-17. PubMed ID: 17324504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
