These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent patency using 64-slice computed tomography. Zhao J; Zheng LL; Yang Y Coron Artery Dis; 2011 Dec; 22(8):540-52. PubMed ID: 21959714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The bifurcation study using 64 multislice computed tomography. Kawasaki T; Koga H; Serikawa T; Orita Y; Ikeda S; Mito T; Gotou Y; Shintani Y; Tanaka A; Tanaka H; Fukuyama T; Koga N Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Apr; 73(5):653-8. PubMed ID: 19180660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of post-intervention minimal stent area on 9-month follow-up patency of paclitaxel-eluting stents: an integrated intravascular ultrasound analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI and TAXUS ATLAS Workhorse, Long Lesion, and Direct Stent Trials. Doi H; Maehara A; Mintz GS; Yu A; Wang H; Mandinov L; Popma JJ; Ellis SG; Grube E; Dawkins KD; Weissman NJ; Turco MA; Ormiston JA; Stone GW JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 2(12):1269-75. PubMed ID: 20129555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Occluded stent in an extraluminal plane of the right coronary artery. Zia MI; Madan M J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2011; 5(5):338-9. PubMed ID: 21820379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impairment factors for evaluating the patency of drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents in coronary arteries by 64-slice computed tomography versus conventional coronary angiography. Nakamura K; Funabashi N; Uehara M; Suzuki K; Terao M; Okubo K; Mita Y; Maeda F; Komuro I Int J Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 130(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 18180050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Schuijf JD; Bax JJ; Jukema JW; Lamb HJ; Warda HM; Vliegen HW; de Roos A; van der Wall EE Am J Cardiol; 2004 Aug; 94(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 15325923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery stents patency after PTCA: role of Multislice Computed Tomography. Ligabue G; Rossi R; Ratti C; Favali M; Modena MG; Romagnoli R Radiol Med; 2004; 108(1-2):128-37. PubMed ID: 15269696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Van Mieghem CA; Cademartiri F; Mollet NR; Malagutti P; Valgimigli M; Meijboom WB; Pugliese F; McFadden EP; Ligthart J; Runza G; Bruining N; Smits PC; Regar E; van der Giessen WJ; Sianos G; van Domburg R; de Jaegere P; Krestin GP; Serruys PW; de Feyter PJ Circulation; 2006 Aug; 114(7):645-53. PubMed ID: 16894038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coronary artery visualization using a 64-row multi-slice computed tomography in unselected patients with definite or suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with invasive coronary angiography. Sosnowski M; Pysz P; Gola A; Szymański L; Tendera M Cardiol J; 2009; 16(5):413-7. PubMed ID: 19753519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stent expansion as a mechanical parameter to predict late stent patency: back to the basics. Honda Y; Fitzgerald PJ JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 2(12):1276-8. PubMed ID: 20129556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital enhancement of stent images in primary and secondary percutaneous coronary revascularisation. Córdova J; Aleong G; Colmenarez H; Cruz A; Canales E; Jimenez-Quevedo P; Hernández R; Alfonso F; Macaya C; Bañuelos C; den Hartog W; Escaned J EuroIntervention; 2009 May; 5 Suppl D():D101-6. PubMed ID: 19736057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Assessment of coronary artery stents in computed tomography: state of the art]. Krupiński M; Miszalski-Jamka T; Klimeczek P; Banyś RP; Irzyk M; Laskowicz B; Pasowicz M Przegl Lek; 2010; 67(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 20557013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Heart imaging: the accuracy of the 64-MSCT in the detection of coronary artery disease. Alessandri N; Di Matteo A; Rondoni G; Petrassi M; Tufani F; Ferrari R; Laghi A Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2009; 13(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 19673166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis by 64-section computed tomography: factors affecting assessment and accurate diagnosis. Chung SH; Kim YJ; Hur J; Lee HJ; Choe KO; Kim TH; Choi BW J Thorac Imaging; 2010 Feb; 25(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 20160604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical applications of a new Enhanced Stent Imaging technology. Nazif TM; Weisz G; Moses JW Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Dec; 82(7):1115-22. PubMed ID: 23404958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stenting small vessels? Not a small issue. Bass TA Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Aug; 62(4):430-1. PubMed ID: 15274149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]