These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention in native coronary arteries vs. bypass grafts in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Varghese I; Samuel J; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2009; 10(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 19327672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Percutaneous versus surgical revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease: a single center 10 year follow-up of SOS trial patients. Buszman P; Wiernek S; Szymanski R; Bialkowska B; Buszman P; Fil W; Stables R; Bochenek A; Martin J; Tendera M Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Sep; 74(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 19360866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The evolution of repeat coronary artery surgery. Noyez L EuroIntervention; 2009 May; 5 Suppl D():D30-3. PubMed ID: 19736067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do differences in repeat revascularization explain the antianginal benefits of bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention?: implications for future treatment comparisons. Arnold SV; Magnuson EA; Wang K; Serruys PW; Kappetein AP; Mohr FW; Cohen DJ; Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2012 May; 5(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 22496114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Isolated disease of the proximal left anterior descending artery comparing the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass surgery. Kapoor JR; Gienger AL; Ardehali R; Varghese R; Perez MV; Sundaram V; McDonald KM; Owens DK; Hlatky MA; Bravata DM JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Oct; 1(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 19463349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]