97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19736173)
1. Evaluation of the MyWellness Key accelerometer.
Herrmann SD; Hart TL; Lee CD; Ainsworth BE
Br J Sports Med; 2011 Feb; 45(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 19736173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a commercially available pedometer used to promote physical activity as part of a national programme.
Clemes SA; O'Connell S; Rogan LM; Griffiths PL
Br J Sports Med; 2010 Dec; 44(16):1178-83. PubMed ID: 19474004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions.
Le Masurier GC; Tudor-Locke C
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 May; 35(5):867-71. PubMed ID: 12750599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patterns of physical activity in free-living adults in the Southern United States.
Buchowski MS; Acra S; Majchrzak KM; Sun M; Chen KY
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2004 May; 58(5):828-37. PubMed ID: 15116087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the MyWellness Key accelerometer in people with type 2 diabetes.
McGinley SK; Armstrong MJ; Khandwala F; Zanuso S; Sigal RJ
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2015 Nov; 40(11):1193-8. PubMed ID: 26489052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accelerometer-determined physical activity in adults and older people.
Hansen BH; Kolle E; Dyrstad SM; Holme I; Anderssen SA
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Feb; 44(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 21796052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of activity monitors in controlled and free-living environments.
Feito Y; Bassett DR; Thompson DL
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Apr; 44(4):733-41. PubMed ID: 21904249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of physical activity measures used in middle-aged women.
Pettee Gabriel K; McClain JJ; Lee CD; Swan PD; Alvar BA; Mitros MR; Ainsworth BE
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2009 Jul; 41(7):1403-12. PubMed ID: 19516161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Criterion-related validity of the short International Physical Activity Questionnaire against exercise capacity in young adults.
Papathanasiou G; Georgoudis G; Georgakopoulos D; Katsouras C; Kalfakakou V; Evangelou A
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2010 Aug; 17(4):380-6. PubMed ID: 19940775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Concurrent validation of the Actigraph gt3x+, Polar Active accelerometer, Omron HJ-720 and Yamax Digiwalker SW-701 pedometer step counts in lab-based and free-living settings.
Lee JA; Williams SM; Brown DD; Laurson KR
J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 25517396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discrepancies between methods of identifying objectively determined physical activity.
Ham SA; Reis JP; Strath SJ; Dubose KD; Ainsworth BE
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Jan; 39(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 17218884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation and calibration of an accelerometer in preschool children.
Pate RR; Almeida MJ; McIver KL; Pfeiffer KA; Dowda M
Obesity (Silver Spring); 2006 Nov; 14(11):2000-6. PubMed ID: 17135617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of physical activity intensity, frequency, and activity type on 10-y weight change in middle-aged men and women.
Littman AJ; Kristal AR; White E
Int J Obes (Lond); 2005 May; 29(5):524-33. PubMed ID: 15672107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physical activity is associated with risk factors for chronic disease across adult women's life cycle.
Woolf K; Reese CE; Mason MP; Beaird LC; Tudor-Locke C; Vaughan LA
J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Jun; 108(6):948-59. PubMed ID: 18502225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Objective and subjective measures of sedentary behavior and physical activity.
Hart TL; Ainsworth BE; Tudor-Locke C
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Mar; 43(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 20631642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of physical activity monitors in pregnant women.
Connolly CP; Coe DP; Kendrick JM; Bassett DR; Thompson DL
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Jun; 43(6):1100-5. PubMed ID: 21085037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors in persons with multiple sclerosis and controls.
Sandroff BM; Motl RW
Disabil Rehabil; 2013 May; 35(9):725-31. PubMed ID: 23557239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accelerometry in persons with multiple sclerosis: measurement of physical activity or walking mobility?
Weikert M; Motl RW; Suh Y; McAuley E; Wynn D
J Neurol Sci; 2010 Mar; 290(1-2):6-11. PubMed ID: 20060544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gait speed and step-count monitor accuracy in community-dwelling older adults.
Storti KL; Pettee KK; Brach JS; Talkowski JB; Richardson CR; Kriska AM
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 Jan; 40(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18091020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three models of actigraph accelerometers during free living and controlled laboratory conditions.
Lee KY; Macfarlane DJ; Cerin E
Eur J Sport Sci; 2013; 13(3):332-9. PubMed ID: 23679150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]