527 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19736180)
1. A simple physiologic algorithm for managing hemodynamics using stroke volume and stroke volume variation: physiologic optimization program.
McGee WT
J Intensive Care Med; 2009; 24(6):352-60. PubMed ID: 19736180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge.
Osman D; Ridel C; Ray P; Monnet X; Anguel N; Richard C; Teboul JL
Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 17080001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function.
Reuter DA; Kirchner A; Felbinger TW; Weis FC; Kilger E; Lamm P; Goetz AE
Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5):1399-404. PubMed ID: 12771609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Passive leg raising is predictive of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with severe sepsis or acute pancreatitis.
Préau S; Saulnier F; Dewavrin F; Durocher A; Chagnon JL
Crit Care Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3):819-25. PubMed ID: 20016380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated pre-ejection period variation predicts fluid responsiveness in low tidal volume ventilated pigs.
Vistisen ST; Koefoed-Nielsen J; Larsson A
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2010 Feb; 54(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 19681786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relative value of pressures and volumes in assessing fluid responsiveness after valvular and coronary artery surgery.
Breukers RM; Trof RJ; de Wilde RB; van den Berg PC; Twisk JW; Jansen JR; Groeneveld J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 18835782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Arterial pulse pressure variation predicting fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.
Auler JO; Galas FR; Sundin MR; Hajjar LA
Shock; 2008 Oct; 30 Suppl 1():18-22. PubMed ID: 18704014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of tidal volume on the dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.
Charron C; Fessenmeyer C; Cosson C; Mazoit JX; Hebert JL; Benhamou D; Edouard AR
Anesth Analg; 2006 May; 102(5):1511-7. PubMed ID: 16632835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The ability of pleth variability index to predict the hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients under general anesthesia.
Desebbe O; Boucau C; Farhat F; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M
Anesth Analg; 2010 Mar; 110(3):792-8. PubMed ID: 20185658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monitoring fluid responsiveness.
Hofer CK; Cannesson M
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2011 Jun; 49(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 21729812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The intrathoracic blood volume index as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure: a comparison with central venous pressure.
Muller L; Louart G; Bengler C; Fabbro-Peray P; Carr J; Ripart J; de La Coussaye JE; Lefrant JY
Anesth Analg; 2008 Aug; 107(2):607-13. PubMed ID: 18633040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hemodynamic and respiratory changes during lung recruitment and descending optimal positive end-expiratory pressure titration in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Toth I; Leiner T; Mikor A; Szakmany T; Bogar L; Molnar Z
Crit Care Med; 2007 Mar; 35(3):787-93. PubMed ID: 17255855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Passive leg raising predicts volume responsiveness in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock].
Huang L; Zhang WX; Cai WX; Zhu ZS; Zhang C; Jiang CL
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2011 Mar; 23(3):154-7. PubMed ID: 21366944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study.
Muller L; Toumi M; Bousquet PJ; Riu-Poulenc B; Louart G; Candela D; Zoric L; Suehs C; de La Coussaye JE; Molinari N; Lefrant JY;
Anesthesiology; 2011 Sep; 115(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 21792056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac surgery.
Bennett-Guerrero E; Kahn RA; Moskowitz DM; Falcucci O; Bodian CA
Mt Sinai J Med; 2002; 69(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11832979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Should dynamic parameters for prediction of fluid responsiveness be indexed to the tidal volume?
Vistisen ST; Koefoed-Nielsen J; Larsson A
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2010 Feb; 54(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 19764908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pulse pressure variation: beyond the fluid management of patients with shock.
Michard F; Lopes MR; Auler JO
Crit Care; 2007; 11(3):131. PubMed ID: 17521454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of changes in blood pressure and airway pressures on parameters of fluid responsiveness.
Sakka SG; Becher L; Kozieras J; van Hout N
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Apr; 26(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 19401662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
