These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19736290)

  • 21. Mortality salience enhances racial in-group bias in empathic neural responses to others' suffering.
    Li X; Liu Y; Luo S; Wu B; Wu X; Han S
    Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():376-85. PubMed ID: 26074201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Neuronal generator patterns at scalp elicited by lateralized aversive pictures reveal consecutive stages of motivated attention.
    Kayser J; Tenke CE; Abraham KS; Alschuler DM; Alvarenga JE; Skipper J; Warner V; Bruder GE; Weissman MM
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():337-350. PubMed ID: 27263509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neural evidence for the threat detection advantage: differential attention allocation to angry and happy faces.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schmidt-Daffy M; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):697-707. PubMed ID: 20883506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Why do people perceive ingroup homogeneity on ingroup traits and outgroup homogeneity on outgroup traits?
    Rubin M; Badea C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Jan; 33(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 17178928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Working memory load reduces facilitated processing of threatening faces: an ERP study.
    Van Dillen LF; Derks B
    Emotion; 2012 Dec; 12(6):1340-9. PubMed ID: 22642340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of stereotypical primes on the neural processing of racially ambiguous faces.
    Dickter CL; Kittel JA
    Soc Neurosci; 2012; 7(6):622-31. PubMed ID: 22642396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the immediate consequences of intergroup categorization: activation of approach and avoidance motor behavior toward ingroup and outgroup members.
    Paladino MP; Castelli L
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):755-68. PubMed ID: 18388255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Altered event-related potentials in adults with ADHD during emotional faces processing.
    Raz S; Dan O
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Mar; 126(3):514-23. PubMed ID: 25018010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. I'm like you and you're like me: social projection and self-stereotyping both help explain self-other correspondence.
    Cho JC; Knowles ED
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Mar; 104(3):444-56. PubMed ID: 23276270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Overlapping mental representations of self, ingroup, and outgroup: unraveling self-stereotyping and self-anchoring.
    Otten S; Epstude K
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Jul; 32(7):957-69. PubMed ID: 16738028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Why We Learn Less from Observing Outgroups.
    Kang P; Burke CJ; Tobler PN; Hein G
    J Neurosci; 2021 Jan; 41(1):144-152. PubMed ID: 33203741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Enhanced neural reactivity and selective attention to threat in anxiety.
    Eldar S; Yankelevitch R; Lamy D; Bar-Haim Y
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 85(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 20655976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Physical aggression and attentional bias to angry faces: An event related potential study.
    Crago RV; Renoult L; Biggart L; Nobes G; Satmarean T; Bowler JO
    Brain Res; 2019 Nov; 1723():146387. PubMed ID: 31419430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ingroup/outgroup membership modulates fairness consideration: neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations.
    Wang Y; Zhang Z; Bai L; Lin C; Osinsky R; Hewig J
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():39827. PubMed ID: 28051156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory.
    Wiese H; Schweinberger SR; Hansen K
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Oct; 46(12):2973-85. PubMed ID: 18602408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The other side of we: when outgroup members express common identity.
    Gómez A; Dovidio JF; Huici C; Gaertner SL; Cuadrado I
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1613-26. PubMed ID: 18832337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Recognition advantage of happy faces: tracing the neurocognitive processes.
    Calvo MG; Beltrán D
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Sep; 51(11):2051-61. PubMed ID: 23880097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perceiving ingroup and outgroup faces within and across nations.
    Kawakami K; Friesen JP; Fang X
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Aug; 113(3):551-574. PubMed ID: 35383905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Determinants of automatic age and race bias: ingroup-outgroup distinction salience moderates automatic evaluations of social groups.
    Heitmann S; Reichardt R
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1328775. PubMed ID: 38562233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ethnic effects when facing children: An ERP study.
    Spencer H; Heitland I; Montoya ER; Branje SJT; Bos PA
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Oct; 138():56-62. PubMed ID: 30130613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.