170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19736666)
1. Interview with director John E. Niederhuber, M.D.: National Cancer Institute stakes out new directions with stimulus funds.
Niederhuber JE
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1169. PubMed ID: 19736666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. StatBite: Stimulus funding: where does the NCI propose to invest?
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1169. PubMed ID: 19679852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer research: evaluating the sequester's impact.
Schmidt C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(16):1160-1. PubMed ID: 23904503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bottom-line reality tempers cancer researchers' excitement.
Benowitz S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1166-9. PubMed ID: 19679851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Windfall warning.
Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):847-8. PubMed ID: 19829323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. John Niederhuber: thinking like a director.
Vanchieri C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Sep; 98(18):1266-8. PubMed ID: 16985241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Budget cuts and the plight of postdocs.
Goozner M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Feb; 105(3):153-4. PubMed ID: 23334223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A conversation with Harold Varmus. Interview by Ushma S. Neill.
Varmus H
J Clin Invest; 2012 Apr; 122(4):1134-5. PubMed ID: 22570861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Science and society: Fifty years later--the 2014 presidential address.
Hudis CA
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jan; 33(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 25452454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Investiture of John E. Niederhuber, M.D., director of National Cancer Institute.
Zerhouni EA; Sharp PA; Leavitt M; Niederhuber JE
Oncologist; 2007 Feb; 12(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 17296807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the stimulus working for you?
Freeman R; Block F; Greenberg D; Levi M; Segal AM; Crow M; Teitelbaum MS
Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):876-8. PubMed ID: 19829353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evolution of the "drivers" of translational cancer epidemiology: analysis of funded grants and the literature.
Lam TK; Chang CQ; Rogers SD; Khoury MJ; Schully SD
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 181(7):451-8. PubMed ID: 25767265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increasing R01 competition concerns researchers.
Vastag B
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Oct; 98(20):1436-8. PubMed ID: 17047187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The stimulus package and medical therapeutics.
Somberg JC
Am J Ther; 2009; 16(2):105. PubMed ID: 19262356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The flat-funding years and the National Cancer Institute: consequences for cancer research.
Hitt E
Mol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 2(4):290-2. PubMed ID: 19383350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. US National Cancer Act: 40 years on.
Lancet; 2011 Oct; 378(9798):1198. PubMed ID: 21962549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Research leaders praise funding increases.
Printz C
Cancer; 2009 Jun; 115(11):2377-8. PubMed ID: 19455712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Congress OKs $2 Billion Boost for the NIH.
Cancer Discov; 2017 Jul; 7(7):657. PubMed ID: 28522683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A cure for cancer research.
Nat Med; 2010 Aug; 16(8):829. PubMed ID: 20689526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A lost generation.
Weinberg RA
Cell; 2006 Jul; 126(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 16839866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
