These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19737692)

  • 1. In vivo validation of a novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system (CardiOp-B): comparison with a conventional two-dimensional system (CAAS II) and with special reference to optical coherence tomography.
    Tsuchida K; van der Giessen WJ; Patterson M; Tanimoto S; García-García HM; Regar E; Ligthart JM; Maugenest AM; Maatrijk G; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2007 May; 3(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 19737692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. First direct in vivo comparison of two commercially available three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography systems.
    Ramcharitar S; Daeman J; Patterson M; van Guens RJ; Boersma E; Serruys PW; van der Giessen WJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Jan; 71(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18098181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional vessel analyses provide more accurate length estimations than the gold standard QCA.
    Meerkin D; Marom H; Cohen-Biton O; Einav S
    J Interv Cardiol; 2010 Apr; 23(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 20236215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparisons of angiographic core laboratory analyses of phantom and clinical images: interlaboratory variability.
    Beauman GJ; Reiber JH; Koning G; Vogel RA
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 8770475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS).
    Schuurbiers JC; Lopez NG; Ligthart J; Gijsen FJ; Dijkstra J; Serruys PW; Van der Steen AF; Wentzel JJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Apr; 73(5):620-6. PubMed ID: 19309696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach.
    Keane D; Haase J; Slager CJ; Montauban van Swijndregt E; Lehmann KG; Ozaki Y; di Mario C; Kirkeeide R; Serruys PW
    Circulation; 1995 Apr; 91(8):2174-83. PubMed ID: 7697846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (2D-QCA) with optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the assessment of coronary artery lesion dimensions.
    Mazhar J; Shaw E; Allahwala UK; Figtree GA; Bhindi R
    Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc; 2015 Jun; 7():14-17. PubMed ID: 28785639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative angiography and optical coherence tomography for the functional assessment of nonobstructive coronary stenoses: comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Pyxaras SA; Tu S; Barbato E; Barbati G; Di Serafino L; De Vroey F; Toth G; Mangiacapra F; Sinagra G; De Bruyne B; Reiber JH; Wijns W
    Am Heart J; 2013 Dec; 166(6):1010-1018.e1. PubMed ID: 24268215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advanced three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic assessment of bifurcation lesions: methodology and phantom validation.
    Girasis C; Schuurbiers JC; Muramatsu T; Aben JP; Onuma Y; Soekhradj S; Morel MA; van Geuns RJ; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2013 Apr; 8(12):1451-60. PubMed ID: 23680960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of coronary lumen reconstruction on the estimation of endothelial shear stress: in vivo comparison of three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional fusion combining optical coherent tomography.
    Kweon J; Kang SJ; Kim YH; Lee JG; Han S; Ha H; Yang DH; Kang JW; Lim TH; Kwon O; Ahn JM; Lee PH; Park DW; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Oct; 19(10):1134-1141. PubMed ID: 29028985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic models for bifurcation segmental analysis: in vitro validation of CAAS against precision manufactured plexiglas phantoms.
    Girasis C; Schuurbiers JC; Onuma Y; Aben JP; Weijers B; Boersma E; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 May; 77(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20939040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is quantitative angiography sufficient to guide stent implantation? A comparison with three-dimensional reconstruction of intracoronary ultrasound images.
    Prati F; Gil R; Di Mario C; Ozaki Y; Bruining N; Camenzind E; de Feyter PJ; Roelandt JR; Serruys PW
    G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Apr; 27(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 9199951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is there an effect of flat-panel-based imaging systems on quantitative coronary and vascular angiography?
    Tuinenburg JC; Koning G; Seppenwoolde Y; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Oct; 68(4):561-6. PubMed ID: 16969851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In-vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantoms in porcine coronary arteries.
    Haase J; Di Mario C; Slager CJ; van der Giessen WJ; den Boer A; de Feyter PJ; Reiber JH; Verdouw PD; Serruys PW
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 Sep; 27(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 1525805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of quantitative coronary angiography systems using a unique set of in vivo coronary stenosis images.
    Mancini GB; Yeoh E; Kamimura C; Abbott D
    Can J Cardiol; 2001 Jul; 17(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 11468645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of an accurate method for three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative assessment of volumes, lengths and diameters of coronary vascular branches and segments from biplane angiographic projections.
    Wellnhofer E; Wahle A; Mugaragu I; Gross J; Oswald H; Fleck E
    Int J Card Imaging; 1999 Oct; 15(5):339-53; discussion 355-6. PubMed ID: 10595401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative coronary arteriography on digital flat-panel system.
    Van Herck PL; Gavit L; Gorissen P; Wuyts FL; Claeys MJ; Bosmans JM; Benali K; Vrints CJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Oct; 63(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 15390252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of different quantitative coronary analysis systems: ARTREK, CAAS, and CMS.
    Hausleiter J; Nolte CW; Jost S; Wiese B; Sturm M; Lichtlen PR
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):14-22; discussion 23. PubMed ID: 8770474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Arterial wall imaging: evaluation with 16-section multidetector CT in blood vessel phantoms and ex vivo coronary arteries.
    Ferencik M; Chan RC; Achenbach S; Lisauskas JB; Houser SL; Hoffmann U; Abbara S; Cury RC; Bouma BE; Tearney GJ; Brady TJ
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):708-16. PubMed ID: 16857982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Edge detection versus densitometry in the quantitative assessment of stenosis phantoms: an in vivo comparison in porcine coronary arteries.
    Di Mario C; Haase J; den Boer A; Reiber JH; Serruys PW
    Am Heart J; 1992 Nov; 124(5):1181-9. PubMed ID: 1442484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.