These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19737779)
1. Maintenance of a deep bite prior to surgical mandibular advancement. de Coul FO; Oosterkamp BC; Jansma J; Bierman MW; Pruim GJ; Sandham A Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 19737779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures. Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical options in deep-bite mandibular deficiency with prominent chin - aesthetic considerations. Mommaerts MY; Shteif M; Hendrickx K; Laster Z J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 32(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 14980593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Kaczynski R; Shunock M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 11500654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery. Eggensperger N; Smolka K; Luder J; Iizuka T Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 16344217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance versus mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Treatment effects and long-term stability of adult Class II patients. Chaiyongsirisern A; Rabie AB; Wong RW Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1084-94. PubMed ID: 19852598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Soft tissue stability in segmental distraction of the anterior mandibular alveolar process. A 2-year follow-up. Joss CU; Triaca A; Antonini M; Kiliaridis S; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 41(5):560-5. PubMed ID: 22204924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgery-first approach in skeletal class III malocclusion treated with 2-jaw surgery: evaluation of surgical movement and postoperative orthodontic treatment. Baek SH; Ahn HW; Kwon YH; Choi JY J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):332-8. PubMed ID: 20186090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correction of skeletal Class II--anterior deep bite and prominent chin by forced surgical rotation of the mandible. Mommaerts MY; López-Arcas JM; Schurmans AM Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 48(5):349-51. PubMed ID: 20170993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement and its effect on relapse. Angle AD; Rebellato J; Sheats RD J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 17174764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients. Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study. Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skeletal and dental stability of segmental distraction of the anterior mandibular alveolar process. A 2-year follow-up. Joss CU; Triaca A; Antonini M; Kiliaridis S; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 41(5):553-9. PubMed ID: 22356741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bimaxillary surgery in Class III malocclusion: soft and hard tissue changes. Aydil B; Özer N; Marşan G J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 23182267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term skeletal and profile stability after surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II and Class III malocclusion. de Lir Ade L; de Moura WL; Oliveira Ruellas AC; Gomes Souza MM; Nojima LI J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 41(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 23196069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stability of the hard and soft tissue profile after mandibular advancement in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study. Joss CU; Thüer UW Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 17962316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical prediction of skeletal and soft tissue changes in treatment of Class II. de Lira Ade L; de Moura WL; Artese F; Bittencourt MA; Nojima LI J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 23201327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]