These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19737839)

  • 1. Optimisation of patient radiation protection in conventional X-ray imaging procedures using film reject analysis: a demonstration of the importance of rare earth screen-film systems.
    Inkoom S; Schandorf C; Fletcher JJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Sep; 136(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 19737839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of AEC chamber selection on patient dose and image quality.
    Hawking N; Elmore A
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(5):411-9. PubMed ID: 19457845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical comparison of high-speed rare-earth screen and par-speed screen for diagnostic efficacy and radiation dosage.
    Robinson T; Becker JA; Olson AP
    Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):214-6. PubMed ID: 6821592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Dose reduction during radiological examination using high intensity rare earth screens or increased kV (author's transl)].
    Freyschmidt J; Saure D; Ujak W; Nüsslin F
    Rofo; 1978 Jul; 129(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 149722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of patient doses for common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Latvian hospitals, analysis of radiographic techniques and comparison with European guidelines.
    Bogucarskis K; Salmins A; Gfirtner H; Anatschkowa E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):176-9. PubMed ID: 15933103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Management of patient doses and diagnostic reference levels in X-ray radiography in Lithuania.
    Ziliukas J; Krynke L; Urboniene A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):313-6. PubMed ID: 20211916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Plain radiography with a rare-earth screen: comparison with calcium tungstate screen.
    Picus D; McAlister WH; Smith E; Rodewald S; Jost RG; Evens RG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Dec; 143(6):1335-8. PubMed ID: 6333800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative evaluation of rare-earth screen-film systems. System speed, contrast, sensitometry, RMS noise, square-wave response function, and contrast-dose-detail analysis.
    Fearon T; Vucich J; Hoe J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):654-62. PubMed ID: 3744739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rare-earth and calcium tungstate intensifying screens, a comparative study of relative speed, radiation doses and resolving power.
    de Carvalho A; Jørgensen J
    Rofo; 1978 Mar; 128(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 147838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dose-reducing strategies in combination offers substantial potential benefits to females requiring X-ray examination.
    Grondin Y; Matthews K; McEntee M; Rainford L; Casey M; Tonra M; Al-Qattan E; McCrudden T; Foley M; Brennan PC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 14978292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An economic evaluation of the use of rare earth screens to reduce the radiation dose from diagnostic X-ray procedures in Israel.
    Ginsberg GM; Schlesinger T; Ben-Shlomo A; Kushilevsky A; Margaliot M; Oren M; Finkleman M; Friedman A; Handlesman M; Lev B
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):406-12. PubMed ID: 9659134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose efficiency of screen-film systems used in pediatric radiography.
    Cohen G; Wagner LK; McDaniel DL; Robinson LH
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):187-93. PubMed ID: 6729110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
    Huda W
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of a patient dose survey on diagnostic radiology in Lithuania.
    Ziliukas J; Morkunas G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):172-5. PubMed ID: 15933102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of rare earth intensifying screens in cephalometric radiography.
    Stathopoulos V; Poulton DR
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 2180348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bulgarian experience in the establishment of reference dose levels and implementation of a quality control system in diagnostic radiology.
    Vassileva J; Dimov A; Slavchev A; Karadjov A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):131-4. PubMed ID: 16464832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.