1191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19738094)
1. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals.
Kulkarni AV; Aziz B; Shams I; Busse JW
JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(10):1092-6. PubMed ID: 19738094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Croatian Medical Journal citation score in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
Sember M; Utrobicić A; Petrak J
Croat Med J; 2010 Apr; 51(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 20401951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Google Scholar versus PubMed in locating primary literature to answer drug-related questions.
Freeman MK; Lauderdale SA; Kendrach MG; Woolley TW
Ann Pharmacother; 2009 Mar; 43(3):478-84. PubMed ID: 19261965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
Anker MS; Hadzibegovic S; Lena A; Haverkamp W
ESC Heart Fail; 2019 Dec; 6(6):1291-1312. PubMed ID: 31886636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science.
Bakkalbasi N; Bauer K; Glover J; Wang L
Biomed Digit Libr; 2006 Jun; 3():7. PubMed ID: 16805916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of Citations in Neurosurgical Research: A 5-Year Follow-Up.
Lee KE; McMullen N; Kota H; Peterson K; Oravec C; Frey C; Kittel CA; Wolfe SQ; Fargen KM
World Neurosurg; 2021 Sep; 153():e66-e75. PubMed ID: 34129967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the impact of paediatric oncology publications using three citation databases.
Arora RS; Eden TO
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2011 Jan; 56(1):152-3. PubMed ID: 20922764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing.
De Groote SL; Raszewski R
Nurs Outlook; 2012; 60(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 22748758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation rates: a case study of medical physics and biomedical engineering: what gets cited and what doesn't?
Trapp J
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2016 Dec; 39(4):817-823. PubMed ID: 27578318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An Audit of Top Citations Published in Pediatric Emergency Care.
Waseem M; Uffer H; Josephson E
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2016 May; 32(5):279-85. PubMed ID: 27139288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Google Scholar and the h-index in biomedicine: the popularization of bibliometric assessment].
Cabezas-Clavijo A; Delgado-López-Cózar E
Med Intensiva; 2013; 37(5):343-54. PubMed ID: 23517697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.
Falagas ME; Pitsouni EI; Malietzis GA; Pappas G
FASEB J; 2008 Feb; 22(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 17884971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Citations and the h index of soil researchers and journals in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
Minasny B; Hartemink AE; McBratney A; Jang HJ
PeerJ; 2013; 1():e183. PubMed ID: 24167778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of Citations in Neurosurgical Research.
Oravec CS; Frey CD; Berwick BW; Vilella L; Aschenbrenner CA; Wolfe SQ; Fargen KM
World Neurosurg; 2019 Oct; 130():e82-e89. PubMed ID: 31158543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations.
Martín-Martín A; Thelwall M; Orduna-Malea E; Delgado López-Cózar E
Scientometrics; 2021; 126(1):871-906. PubMed ID: 32981987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do bibliometric findings differ between Medline, Google Scholar and Web of Science? Bibliometry of publications after oral presentation to the 2013 and 2014 French Society of Arthroscopy (SFA) Congresses.
Villatte G; Marcheix PS; Antoni M; Devos P; Descamps S; Boisgard S; Erivan R
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 106(8):1469-1473. PubMed ID: 33153959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact factor of an open access journal does not contribute to an article's citations.
Chua SK; Qureshi AM; Krishnan V; Pai DR; Kamal LB; Gunasegaran S; Afzal MZ; Ambawatta L; Gan JY; Kew PY; Winn T; Sood S
F1000Res; 2017; 6():208. PubMed ID: 28649365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A bibliometric study of the top 100 most-cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in endodontic journals.
Ahmad P; Dummer PMH; Chaudhry A; Rashid U; Saif S; Asif JA
Int Endod J; 2019 Sep; 52(9):1297-1316. PubMed ID: 31009099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency.
Nieminen P; Carpenter J; Rucker G; Schumacher M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep; 6():42. PubMed ID: 16948835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of Orthopaedic Research Produced During the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Balazs GC; Dickens JF; Brelin AM; Wolfe JA; Rue JP; Potter BK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2777-84. PubMed ID: 25758377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
