These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19738319)

  • 21. A novel approach for EIT regularization via spatial and spectral principal component analysis.
    Goharian M; Bruwer MJ; Jegatheesan A; Moran GR; MacGregor JF
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Sep; 28(9):1001-16. PubMed ID: 17827649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An iterative Newton-Raphson method to solve the inverse admittivity problem.
    Edic PM; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Jain H; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Jul; 45(7):899-908. PubMed ID: 9644899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatial resolution improvement of 3D EIT images by the shrinking sLORETA-FOCUSS algorithm.
    Dong G; Liu H; Bayford RH; Yerworth R; Schimpf PH; Yan W
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S199-208. PubMed ID: 15798233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Statistical estimation of resistance/conductance by electrical impedance tomography measurements.
    Demidenko E; Hartov A; Paulsen K
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):829-38. PubMed ID: 15250635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of J-substitution algorithm.
    Kwon O; Woo EJ; Yoon JR; Seo JK
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Feb; 49(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 12066883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The boundary element method in the forward and inverse problem of electrical impedance tomography.
    de Munck JC; Faes TJ; Heethaar RM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jun; 47(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 10833854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT).
    Merwa R; Hollaus K; Brunner P; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S241-50. PubMed ID: 15798237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Image reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography based on genetic algorithm].
    Hou W; Mo Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Mar; 20(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 12744177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Propagation of measurement noise through backprojection reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography.
    Frangi AF; Riu PJ; Rosell J; Viergever MA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):566-78. PubMed ID: 12166852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of frequency difference reconstruction algorithms for the detection of acute stroke using EIT in a realistic head-shaped tank.
    Packham B; Koo H; Romsauerova A; Ahn S; McEwan A; Jun SC; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2012 May; 33(5):767-86. PubMed ID: 22531059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of applied and induced current electrical impedance tomography.
    Tanguay LF; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1643-9. PubMed ID: 17867356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tissue spectroscopy with electrical impedance tomography: computer simulations.
    Griffiths H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Sep; 42(9):948-54. PubMed ID: 7558071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Calibration methods for a multi-channel multi-frequency EIT system.
    Oh TI; Lee KH; Kim SM; Koo H; Woo EJ; Holder D
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Oct; 28(10):1175-88. PubMed ID: 17906386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Excitation patterns in three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Dehghani H; Soni N; Halter R; Hartov A; Paulsen KD
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S185-97. PubMed ID: 15798231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimation of anomaly location and size using electrical impedance tomography.
    Kwon O; Yoon JR; Seo JK; Woo EJ; Cho YG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 50(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 12617528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using the GRID to improve the computation speed of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) reconstruction algorithms.
    Fritschy J; Horesh L; Holder DS; Bayford RH
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S209-15. PubMed ID: 15798234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. GREIT: a unified approach to 2D linear EIT reconstruction of lung images.
    Adler A; Arnold JH; Bayford R; Borsic A; Brown B; Dixon P; Faes TJ; Frerichs I; Gagnon H; Gärber Y; Grychtol B; Hahn G; Lionheart WR; Malik A; Patterson RP; Stocks J; Tizzard A; Weiler N; Wolf GK
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S35-55. PubMed ID: 19491438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Objective selection of hyperparameter for EIT.
    Graham BM; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S65-79. PubMed ID: 16636421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. J-substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): phantom experiments for static resistivity images.
    Khang HS; Lee BI; Oh SH; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Cho MH; Kwon O; Yoon JR; Seo JK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):695-702. PubMed ID: 12166867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An image reconstruction algorithm for three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Le Hyaric A; Pidcock MK
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Feb; 48(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 11296879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.